Gang Garrison 2 for the win.

lol, i guess the poll in my thread is redundant now.

Assassinator Wrote:

ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:

ProperBritish Wrote:as ive played WC, id be able to play SC too im quite sure. how are the specs for SC?

System requirements?  It's like a 1997 game, and even then, its requirements were quite modest.

Well, I used to play it back then on a 666MHz Celeron with an old donkey GPU with 16mb of video RAM.

I think it'll run on something lower than that too.

isn't that like the specs of a PSP?

so if it miraculously it became open source, it would run on the PSP.

but I don't see that happening in the PSP's life time, lol.

lol, that would be cool though

meh, i like Red alert 2 then starcraft, lol, but RA2 is none in the choices so i vote for starcraft

Now lets see....

I know how to play all of the mentioned games. HOWEVER;
Knowing how to play =/= Liking or being any good at it.

I never liked Starcraft or Warcraft because:
a) Blizzard made it (and god knows those faggots can't be original about any of their games. Played one awful RTS, played them all.)
b) Played more like an RTS-RPG than straight RTS (scale of control is individual units, values one moderately tough unit surviving for a long time; as opposed to a group of weaker units gone in a flash, but with production times that allow almost instantaneous replacement.)

I can't really explain the last point so well... it's like a sense rather than solid proof.
On the other hand, I love W40k: Dark Crusade and it's Necrons. I love any game that features such hard-hitting units or characters, it's how I roll. Never played or owned AoE 2, but I own AoE 1, and I don't imagine there will be much I can't handle.