Endless Paradigm / Computers & Tech / Crazy Computer / Source Engine Performance

Post Reply 
Source Engine Performance
Author Message
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative

Posts: 17,022.2988
Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1274
Offline
Post: #13
RE: Source Engine Performance
(05/01/2012 08:19 PM)trademark91 Wrote:  I doubt either of them would be able to handle the source engine seeing as the lack of opengl or directx...
That's what porting is for!

(05/01/2012 08:19 PM)trademark91 Wrote:  Plus DOS doesn't even have much multitasking support, which would make it difficult to do multiple things at once. 3.1 may be better capable of doing some more complex tasks.
Did Win3.1 multitask?  I don't really remember opening more than one application on Win3.1, and do remember that it does 'disable' some lower level windows, though that could be just older computers not having the power to multitask rather than the OS itself.
05/01/2012 08:26 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Source Engine Performance - whjms - 04/01/2012, 01:03 PM
RE: Source Engine Performance - Joom - 04/01/2012, 01:49 PM
RE: Source Engine Performance - lembas - 04/01/2012, 03:02 PM
RE: Source Engine Performance - whjms - 05/01/2012, 08:22 AM
RE: Source Engine Performance - carpinttas - 05/01/2012, 11:50 AM
RE: Source Engine Performance - S7* - 05/01/2012, 11:56 AM
RE: Source Engine Performance - Cirehpsa - 05/01/2012, 02:00 PM
RE: Source Engine Performance - whjms - 05/01/2012, 05:28 PM
RE: Source Engine Performance - ZiNgA BuRgA - 05/01/2012 08:26 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme:


Privacy Policy | Endless Paradigm | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication