Endless Paradigm / Computers & Tech / Crazy Computer / Source Engine Performance

Post Reply 
Source Engine Performance
Author Message
trademark91
Unique?
Fractal Insanity

Posts: 4,719.9300
Threads: 269
Joined: 4th Jan 2008
Reputation: -6.15982
E-Pigs: 105.8691
Offline
Post: #12
RE: Source Engine Performance
(05/01/2012 08:02 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:  
(05/01/2012 04:15 PM)Assassinator Wrote:  Windows 3.1 is the best.  Runs on 8MB of RAM and easier to use than any modern Windows.
Windows 3.1 was just an interface to DOS for n00bs.
May as well just use DOS.

I doubt either of them would be able to handle the source engine seeing as the lack of opengl or directx...


Plus DOS doesn't even have much multitasking support, which would make it difficult to do multiple things at once. 3.1 may be better capable of doing some more complex tasks.
[Image: 531115][Image: 76561198014212040.png]
windows Proud
(This post was last modified: 05/01/2012 08:21 PM by trademark91.)
05/01/2012 08:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Source Engine Performance - whjms - 04/01/2012, 01:03 PM
RE: Source Engine Performance - Joom - 04/01/2012, 01:49 PM
RE: Source Engine Performance - lembas - 04/01/2012, 03:02 PM
RE: Source Engine Performance - whjms - 05/01/2012, 08:22 AM
RE: Source Engine Performance - carpinttas - 05/01/2012, 11:50 AM
RE: Source Engine Performance - S7* - 05/01/2012, 11:56 AM
RE: Source Engine Performance - Cirehpsa - 05/01/2012, 02:00 PM
RE: Source Engine Performance - whjms - 05/01/2012, 05:28 PM
RE: Source Engine Performance - trademark91 - 05/01/2012 08:19 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme:


Privacy Policy | Endless Paradigm | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication