(11/11/2010 01:39 PM)Mc Cabe Wrote:  

(11/11/2010 01:26 PM)ProperBritish Wrote:  

(11/11/2010 01:19 PM)Mc Cabe Wrote:  

(11/11/2010 12:57 PM)1-R Wrote:  

(11/11/2010 12:56 PM)S7* Wrote:  

(11/11/2010 12:39 PM)Mc Cabe Wrote:  Ummm no Chrome for the win now

I'm surprised you would use a browser for nubcakes :<

cheese flavored :<

nubcakes?

Fast as hell, webkit, better than firebug developer tools, great user interface and plugins/themes all that's jazz etc (if you care about that stuff)

Why is Firefox better?

because its more widely supported, that and the fact chrome has the worlds worst gif renderer EVER

lol @ GIF, once that 'bug' is removed you're left with 'more widely supported'. Which means what exactly? That more people use it? develop for it? Just because more people use it, that doesn't mean it's better...obviously...

But so long as the browser isn't IE then there must be a valid reason why someone chose that particular alternative browser... Firefox was the first start and I've got to give Google credit, in more ways than one they managed to streamline the browser UI and that, along with their brand and advertising has got them a slice of the user pie - but it's still unmatched compared to Firefox, which has made it's name being better than IE, reliable and it's extensions was a massive boost into getting as much people switched over as they have. It'll be hard to beat it with Firefox 4 boosting back into the ranks, this competition is very healthy and I can't wait to see it all push HTML5 and CSS3 to become the defacto standards.

And regarding GIF, it's animation capability is used very widely around the net.. APNG isn't taking over anytime soon so you'd think it would get sorted out.

(This post was last modified: 11/11/2010 03:08 PM by S7*.)