Assassinator Wrote:

feinicks Wrote:Yes, but you can have 240 people solve 240 different problems increasing your efficiency by 240%.

Ok, go back and read every post Zinga and I wrote.

Which bit of "most things probably can't be effectively made massively parallel" is that hard to understand?

He's talking about running 240 serial tasks at once.
To be honest, it's one thing I've been interested in - ie running 20+ encodes simultaneously.
Unfortunately, at present, there's other limitations, such as disk seeks, and RAM usage.

It's also rare that you want to run 240 of the same task at once as well.