[Blog] New Computer (v2)
|
Author |
Message |
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1274
|
RE: [Blog] New Computer (v2)
(14/01/2013 09:24 PM)boogschd Wrote: how long did it take for the monitor to be delivered?
Can't say for him, but many of those Korean dealers do expedited delivery. I ordered on Tuesday morning, was sent Wednesday afternoon (I let the dealer do a monitor inspection, which they say takes 1 business day) and arrived in Brisbane late Thursday night, meaning it got delivered Friday morning.
Of course, where you are in the world will have an impact. They claim 2-5 business days to deliver.
Apparently at the resolution, dead pixels are barely visible. I can't seem to see any on my panel.
(14/01/2013 09:24 PM)boogschd Wrote: 10 seconds o.O ... and i thought mine was fast xD (win7 + crucial m4) around 30 seconds
You could probably do 30 seconds on a traditional HDD.
But what you're loading at boot has an effect. I load a fair bit of stuff, although my boot time is probably less than yours.
|
|
14/01/2013 10:50 PM |
|
boogschd
boogyman
Posts: 4,954.3196 Threads: 90
Joined: 29th Nov 2007
Reputation: 4.19708
E-Pigs: 43.6852
|
RE: [Blog] New Computer (v2)
(14/01/2013 10:50 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: Can't say for him, but many of those Korean dealers do expedited delivery. I ordered on Tuesday morning, was sent Wednesday afternoon (I let the dealer do a monitor inspection, which they say takes 1 business day) and arrived in Brisbane late Thursday night, meaning it got delivered Friday morning.
Of course, where you are in the world will have an impact. They claim 2-5 business days to deliver.
Apparently at the resolution, dead pixels are barely visible. I can't seem to see any on my panel.
that's not bad at all, im in the philippines so that makes me closer from korea than you two,
but im guessing it would take around the same time for a monitor to get to me
or maybe +1 more day . lol
but atleast its not THAT long, was half expecting it to be around 10-15 days
and yeah .. i suppose you wouldnt see them at that res :))
(14/01/2013 10:50 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: You could probably do 30 seconds on a traditional HDD.
But what you're loading at boot has an effect. I load a fair bit of stuff, although my boot time is probably less than yours.
i load quite a lot but nothing to heavy (at least i think theyre not xD)
what i notice is it takes longer to boot in post and stuff (probably around 20 sec?) rather than in windows
(This post was last modified: 14/01/2013 11:11 PM by boogschd.)
|
|
14/01/2013 11:08 PM |
|
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1274
|
RE: [Blog] New Computer (v2)
You generally should measure from the bootloader, not from a cold start.
|
|
15/01/2013 12:27 AM |
|
Assassinator
...
Posts: 6,646.6190 Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
|
RE: [Blog] New Computer (v2)
(14/01/2013 10:50 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: (14/01/2013 09:24 PM)boogschd Wrote: how long did it take for the monitor to be delivered?
Can't say for him, but many of those Korean dealers do expedited delivery. I ordered on Tuesday morning, was sent Wednesday afternoon (I let the dealer do a monitor inspection, which they say takes 1 business day) and arrived in Brisbane late Thursday night, meaning it got delivered Friday morning.
Of course, where you are in the world will have an impact. They claim 2-5 business days to deliver.
Took about 5 days for me.
(14/01/2013 10:50 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: Apparently at the resolution, dead pixels are barely visible. I can't seem to see any on my panel.
Yeah, can't really see them normally. I spent a couple of minutes looking very closely to spot all of them.
(14/01/2013 10:50 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: (14/01/2013 09:24 PM)boogschd Wrote: 10 seconds o.O ... and i thought mine was fast xD (win7 + crucial m4) around 30 seconds
You could probably do 30 seconds on a traditional HDD.
But what you're loading at boot has an effect. I load a fair bit of stuff, although my boot time is probably less than yours.
The SSD brand should make pretty much no difference (I mean 5% difference in synthetic benchmarks is like nothing in real life). 64GB is smaller and I heard that large SSDs are faster. Also like zinga said, it depends a LOT on the OS and how much stuff you need to load on boot. My Windows install was fresh with absolutely 0 additional programs installed, and Window 8 seems faster to boot than 7?
(This post was last modified: 15/01/2013 06:01 AM by Assassinator.)
|
|
15/01/2013 05:09 AM |
|
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1274
|
RE: [Blog] New Computer (v2)
(15/01/2013 05:09 AM)Assassinator Wrote: The SSD brand should make pretty much no difference (I mean 5% difference in synthetic benchmarks is like nothing in real life).
Brand not necessarily, but the controller makes a huge difference. I believe some of the cheap SSDs are barely faster than a fast HDD.
Though if you stick to the recommended ones, the differences are small.
|
|
15/01/2013 04:14 PM |
|
Assassinator
...
Posts: 6,646.6190 Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
|
RE: [Blog] New Computer (v2)
(15/01/2013 08:05 AM)ProperBritish Wrote: nice build assassinator, like everyone said, dead pixels suck but at least they're not staring you in the face. i have a thunderbug stuck inside my laptop screen. drives me nuts.
Damn, that would drive me nuts too, I hate insects.
|
|
15/01/2013 06:48 PM |
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)