I remember hearing about this a few months ago on a radio show.  Quite a funny idea.  I don't think I'd use it though.

eww... makes me want to wear a gas mask just in case.

ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:By the way, if you're wondering, although the aim was for gayness, it doesn't state that it has to be used for the purpose.
Just (a) a strong aphrodisiac to increase sexual tendencies and ideally (b) homosexual nature, but doesn't state it has to be on males only...

That sounds nice :D

ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:By the way, if you're wondering, although the aim was for gayness, it doesn't state that it has to be used for the purpose.
Just (a) a strong aphrodisiac to increase sexual tendencies and ideally (b) homosexual nature, but doesn't state it has to be on males only...

diego Wrote:

ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:By the way, if you're wondering, although the aim was for gayness, it doesn't state that it has to be used for the purpose.
Just (a) a strong aphrodisiac to increase sexual tendencies and ideally (b) homosexual nature, but doesn't state it has to be on males only...

That sounds nice :D

feinicks Wrote:eww... makes me want to wear a gas mask just in case.

It kinda says it in the Wiki, but back when I heard about the Gay Bomb, I also remember them saying its principle use would be to cause confusion and distraction among enemy troops. It would make it hard for enemy troops to concentrate on the battle, thus making them an easier enemy to defeat.  At least, that was what I understood to be the case.

i remember hearing about it too on the radio. i think the millitary decided not to use it because itwas 'inhumane'. not that that's ever stopped the millitary.