Post Reply 
Seagate hits one terabit per square inch, compares self favorably to the Milky Way
Author Message
krystabegnalie
~~~~I can cut trees!~~~

Posts: 2,127.4190
Threads: 218
Joined: 21st Jan 2008
Reputation: -6.39875
E-Pigs: 79.3639
Offline
Post: #1
Seagate hits one terabit per square inch, compares self favorably to t
Quote:You know that big new hard drive you just picked up? Get ready to feel bad. Seagate today is talking up the fact that it has managed to cram one terabit (that's one trillion bits, for the record) into a square inch. That super-dense storage comes thanks to heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) technology, a successor to the perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) being utilized in current hard drives. The manufacturer sees the technology hitting the market later this decade, "doubl[ing] the storage capacity of today's hard drives" in its wake. Just how many bits are wee talking about here? Let Seagate put things into astronomical perspective: "The bits within a square inch of disk space, at the new milestone, far outnumber stars in the Milky Way, which astronomers put between 200 billion and 400 billion." More info can be found in the press release after the break.

Spoiler:
Seagate Reaches 1 Terabit Per Square Inch Milestone in Hard Drive Storage with New Technology Demonstration

CUPERTINO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Seagate (NASDAQ:STX) has become the first hard drive maker to achieve the milestone storage density of 1 terabit (1 trillion bits) per square inch, producing a demonstration of the technology that promises to double the storage capacity of today's hard drives upon its introduction later this decade and give rise to 3.5-inch hard drives with an extraordinary capacity of up to 60 terabytes over the 10 years that follow. The bits within a square inch of disk space, at the new milestone, far outnumber stars in the Milky Way, which astronomers put between 200 billion and 400 billion.

"The growth of social media, search engines, cloud computing, rich media and other data-hungry applications continues to stoke demand for ever greater storage capacity"

Seagate reached the landmark data density with heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR), the next-generation recording technology. The current hard drive technology, Perpendicular Magnetic Recording (PMR), is used to record the spectrum of digitized data – from music, photos, and video stored on home desktop and laptop PCs to business information housed in sprawling data centers – on the spinning platters inside every hard drive. PMR technology was introduced in 2006 to replace longitudinal recording, a method in place since the advent of hard drives for computer storage in 1956, and is expected to reach its capacity limit near 1 terabit per square inch in the next few years.

"The growth of social media, search engines, cloud computing, rich media and other data-hungry applications continues to stoke demand for ever greater storage capacity," said Mark Re, senior vice president of Heads and Media Research and Development at Seagate. "Hard disk drive innovations like HAMR will be a key enabler of the development of even more data-intense applications in the future, extending the ways businesses and consumers worldwide use, manage and store digital content."

Hard drive manufacturers increase areal density and capacity by shrinking a platter's data bits to pack more within each square inch of disk space. They also tighten the data tracks, the concentric circles on the disk's surface that anchor the bits. The key to areal density gains is to do both without disruptions to the bits' magnetization, a phenomenon that can garble data. Using HAMR technology, Seagate has achieved a linear bit density of about 2 million bits per inch, once thought impossible, resulting in a data density of just over 1 trillion bits, or 1 terabit, per square inch – 55 percent higher than today's areal density ceiling of 620 gigabits per square inch.

The maximum capacity of today's 3.5-inch hard drives is 3 terabytes (TB), at about 620 gigabits per square inch, while 2.5-inch drives top out at 750 gigabytes (GB), or roughly 500 gigabits per square inch. The first generation of HAMR drives, at just over 1 terabit per square inch, will likely more than double these capacities – to 6TB for 3.5-inch drives and 2TB for 2.5-inch models. The technology offers a scale of capacity growth never before possible, with a theoretical areal density limit ranging from 5 to 10 terabits per square inch – 30TB to 60TB for 3.5-inch drives and 10TB to 20TB for 2.5-inch drives.

source: engadget

holy cow! i can store more pirate stuffs in future, lol

Madwin

Spoiler for don't look, might destruct your mind:
[Image: funny_math.jpg]
Spoiler for anime planet:
[Image: krystabegnalie.jpg]
20/03/2012 01:14 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
whjms
EpiCanadian

Posts: 435.1825
Threads: 126
Joined: 23rd Dec 2008
Reputation: 3.37413
E-Pigs: 24.8045
Offline
Post: #2
RE: Seagate hits one terabit per square inch, compares self favorably
The cost is probably also astronomical.
(This post was last modified: 20/03/2012 04:55 AM by whjms.)
20/03/2012 04:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
S7*
Sweet Dreams

Posts: 16,689.4373
Threads: 1,056
Joined: 3rd Apr 2007
Reputation: 14.29926
E-Pigs: 383.2289
Offline
Post: #3
RE: Seagate hits one terabit per square inch, compares self favorably
Guess HDDs are fighting back using their greatest strength, then. Makes sense.
20/03/2012 05:00 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Jem
Nothing Useful Here

Posts: 920.1188
Threads: 43
Joined: 29th May 2010
Reputation: 3.37413
E-Pigs: 29.6572
Offline
Post: #4
RE: Seagate hits one terabit per square inch, compares self favorably
Maybe my entire life can fit into one of them drives, with 5 terabytes to spare

20/03/2012 11:58 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative

Posts: 17,023.4213
Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.0333
Offline
Post: #5
RE: Seagate hits one terabit per square inch, compares self favorably
Hitachi has 4TB 3.5in drives for a while, and 1TB 2.5in drives are relatively commonplace...

But if the above is to arrive "later in the decade" (i.e 5 years down the track?), that means wee won't be seeing 6TB drives any time soon...
(This post was last modified: 20/03/2012 04:18 PM by ZiNgA BuRgA.)
20/03/2012 04:17 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
St0rMaGe
The Forbidden One
Fractal Insanity

Posts: 1,959.8810
Threads: 104
Joined: 22nd Apr 2011
Reputation: -6.68656
E-Pigs: 62.6909
Offline
Post: #6
RE: Seagate hits one terabit per square inch, compares self favorably
(20/03/2012 04:55 AM)whjms Wrote:  The cost is probably also astronomical.

I agree.
21/03/2012 08:40 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme: