ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1294
|
RE: I'm building a super-budget gaming PC...
(18/04/2010 10:36 PM)Assassinator Wrote: They aren't great, but they work, and this is a budget build.
+ I'm overclocking a quad, on an AMD stock cooler, and nothing blew up yet, so it'll be just fine.
Depends on your case's airflow, your temperate surroundings etc, as well...
Ultimately, I'd put the money for making the system MUCH quieter, since performance isn't an issue. I'd go for a lower CPU just to fit the cost of the cooler in.
(18/04/2010 10:36 PM)Assassinator Wrote: Dump the money on the GPU instead, since this is a gaming machine, and GPU's what counts most for gaming.
Warhammer isn't that graphically demanding from memory...
|
|
18/04/2010 10:45 PM |
|
Assassinator
...
Posts: 6,646.6190 Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
|
RE: I'm building a super-budget gaming PC...
(18/04/2010 10:45 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: Depends on your case's airflow, your temperate surroundings etc, as well...
Ultimately, I'd put the money for making the system MUCH quieter, since performance isn't an issue. I'd go for a lower CPU just to fit the cost of the cooler in.
It won't be all that loud, I found the case fans to be louder (which is why I have the front case fan disabled). Stock fan isn't like THAT bad.
And I heard the design changed (slightly) during the transaction to Phenom II... Has copper heat pipes and stuff on it now, and also looks quite a bit better than whatever I had.
EDIT: Pics
(18/04/2010 10:45 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: Warhammer isn't that graphically demanding from memory...
Probably isn't the only game he's going to be playing in the next 3 years, or however long until he decides to upgrade again.
(This post was last modified: 19/04/2010 12:16 AM by Assassinator.)
|
|
19/04/2010 12:02 AM |
|
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1294
|
RE: I'm building a super-budget gaming PC...
(19/04/2010 12:02 AM)Assassinator Wrote: It won't be all that loud, I found the case fans to be louder (which is why I have the front case fan disabled). Stock fan isn't like THAT bad.
I can hear the stock AMD CPU fan like from the other side of the house...
Dunno about the new HSF though.
(19/04/2010 12:02 AM)Assassinator Wrote: Probably isn't the only game he's going to be playing in the next 3 years, or however long until he decides to upgrade again.
Eh, who cares what he plays later on... :P
Hopefully he'll have other things than gaming to do later down the track.
(This post was last modified: 19/04/2010 04:55 AM by ZiNgA BuRgA.)
|
|
19/04/2010 04:54 AM |
|
PSPkiller
*The Sweaty Indian/Welsh Guy*
Posts: 2,393.2167 Threads: 251
Joined: 24th Jun 2007
Reputation: 0.56947
E-Pigs: 53.7911
|
RE: I'm building a super-budget gaming PC...
(18/04/2010 06:53 PM)Assassinator Wrote: I actually had a PSU blow up on me before, when i upgraded my comp about a year ago. But that was an extremely shitty PSU with really no brand (I spent like 5 minutes looking for the brand, can't find it), that I got from my old computer that wee got many years ago... Couldn't handle my quad, popped and died. Now sitting on some 460W Coolermaster CPU that came with the case I bought, works fine.
Branded PSUs of the lower end should still be pretty cheap. Can get a 430W Thermaltake PSU (the basic one, not the fancy/silent/80+/whatever ones) for like $40AUD (~25GBP) here.
No idea about Arianet. Never heard of them, don't think you can get that brand here in Australia.
Arianet is Aria's own brand. They're no-brand components that Aria themselves have tested and inspected meaning they have some kind of quality control. They're still no brand but they're the best of the no-brand.
(18/04/2010 06:53 PM)Assassinator Wrote: I think I heard somewhere that at the same clock, Phenom2 is about 10-20% faster than Athlon2, don't know how accurate that is, so you may want to do some research yourself.
A bit of benchmark hunting shows a pretty small difference. The Athlon has the shared L3 cache disabled. It does make a difference but it's pretty small. Not worth the extra money IMHO.
(18/04/2010 06:53 PM)Assassinator Wrote: (18/04/2010 10:45 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: Depends on your case's airflow, your temperate surroundings etc, as well...
Ultimately, I'd put the money for making the system MUCH quieter, since performance isn't an issue. I'd go for a lower CPU just to fit the cost of the cooler in.
It won't be all that loud, I found the case fans to be louder (which is why I have the front case fan disabled). Stock fan isn't like THAT bad.
And I heard the design changed (slightly) during the transaction to Phenom II... Has copper heat pipes and stuff on it now, and also looks quite a bit better than whatever I had.
Remember it's a cheap case. I'll do my best to improve the airflow but it still won't be amazing. I'd rather keep the cooler personally. Plus then it means I have a spare stock cooler to kludge onto my old Athlon Thoroughbred for experimentation purposes. Currently using a Pentium II cooler and case fan cable-tied on. It works but obviously not briliantly.
(19/04/2010 12:02 AM)Assassinator Wrote: (18/04/2010 10:45 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: Warhammer isn't that graphically demanding from memory...
Probably isn't the only game he's going to be playing in the next 3 years, or however long until he decides to upgrade again.
It'll be around for a while but he's not into cutting edge games. Mostly plays tactical games and sometimes a spot of the Unreal Tournament series. Anything is better than what he's got at the moment. A Dell bought in 2003 that was spoon when it was new. Came with a Celeron 2.5GHz, 128MB (now 768MB) of DDR RAM, 40GB (now 80GB) hard drive and Intel pre-GMA graphics not upgradable due to a lack of AGP slot and free PCI slots. The motherboard has 3 but one doesn't work, another is used by a TV tuner and the third is for a NIC because the onboard one died too.
(18/04/2010 10:19 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: Don't need 1066MHz, stick to 800MHz. Up to 4GB if you can, otherwise, probably doesn't matter much.
I was just following what the motherboard manual said. I'll drop in a 2x1GB 800MHz kit intead. 4GB would be a waste of a GB as it'll be running XP. I could add an extra GB in future if 2GB isn't enough.
(18/04/2010 10:19 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: 4670 is like double performance of the 4650. Also check prices on the 5570, should be comparable to a 4670.
Aria don't sell the 5570 but a quick look on eBay puts them around £70. Reviews of the 4650 said it was pretty good for it's price. If the 4670 is a lot faster than the 4650 as you said then that's what I'll go for. It's only about £10 more than the 4650 on Aria.
(18/04/2010 10:19 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: Yeah, you can cheapen the PSU if you want.
Done. Swapped it for a case/PSU bundle with a 500w PSU.
[Insert Signature Here]
|
|
19/04/2010 05:07 AM |
|
S7*
Sweet Dreams
Posts: 16,689.4373 Threads: 1,056
Joined: 3rd Apr 2007
Reputation: 14.29926
E-Pigs: 383.2309
|
RE: I'm building a super-budget gaming PC...
(19/04/2010 04:54 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: (19/04/2010 12:02 AM)Assassinator Wrote: Probably isn't the only game he's going to be playing in the next 3 years, or however long until he decides to upgrade again.
Eh, who cares what he plays later on... :P
Retro Gaming for the win~!
|
|
19/04/2010 05:08 AM |
|
Assassinator
...
Posts: 6,646.6190 Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
|
RE: I'm building a super-budget gaming PC...
(19/04/2010 04:54 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: (19/04/2010 12:02 AM)Assassinator Wrote: It won't be all that loud, I found the case fans to be louder (which is why I have the front case fan disabled). Stock fan isn't like THAT bad.
I can hear the stock AMD CPU fan like from the other side of the house...
Dunno about the new HSF though.
Maybe yours is old and full of dust or something, or is spinning WAY too fast (max speed 6000RPM?)
(19/04/2010 05:07 AM)PSPkiller Wrote: A bit of benchmark hunting shows a pretty small difference. The Athlon has the shared L3 cache disabled. It does make a difference but it's pretty small. Not worth the extra money IMHO.
There'll definitely be more difference than just the L3 cache disabled... I know they have different die sizes at least (Athlon 2 being smaller).
(19/04/2010 05:07 AM)PSPkiller Wrote: Remember it's a cheap case. I'll do my best to improve the airflow but it still won't be amazing.
Imo good airflow is overrated. As long as it has a fan, at the back, and mesh (or another fan) at the front so the air can flow though, imo it should be fine. Cases with 6 fans or something are completely unneccessary besides for making your box loud as hell.
|
|
19/04/2010 06:58 AM |
|
PSPkiller
*The Sweaty Indian/Welsh Guy*
Posts: 2,393.2167 Threads: 251
Joined: 24th Jun 2007
Reputation: 0.56947
E-Pigs: 53.7911
|
RE: I'm building a super-budget gaming PC...
[Insert Signature Here]
(This post was last modified: 19/04/2010 08:45 AM by PSPkiller.)
|
|
19/04/2010 07:49 AM |
|
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1294
|
RE: I'm building a super-budget gaming PC...
(19/04/2010 05:07 AM)PSPkiller Wrote: Reviews of the 4650 said it was pretty good for it's price. If the 4670 is a lot faster than the 4650 as you said then that's what I'll go for. It's only about £10 more than the 4650 on Aria.
Seems I was wrong on that: http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-6278-v...eview.html
Still, I'd recommend a 4670 over a 4650.
|
|
19/04/2010 10:21 PM |
|