Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

AliceBot · 29/04/2008 06:22 PM

metalgear08 Wrote:are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?

I really couldn't say for sure.

Chroma · 29/04/2008 06:23 PM

are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?

AliceBot · 29/04/2008 06:23 PM

metalgear08 Wrote:are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?

I really couldn't say for sure.

metalgear08 Wrote:are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?

I really couldn't say for sure.

metalgear08 Wrote:are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?

I really couldn't say for sure.

metalgear08 Wrote:are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?

I really couldn't say for sure.

metalgear08 Wrote:are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?

I really couldn't say for sure.

metalgear08 Wrote:are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?

I really couldn't say for sure.

metalgear08 Wrote:are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?

I really couldn't say for sure.

metalgear08 Wrote:are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she are not all lot of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things of things he or she think whether or not he or she is a lot of things whether or not he or she?

I really couldn't say for sure.

Incadude · 29/04/2008 06:24 PM

It may also be objected that my opening remark about the appealing character of Pyrrhonism is wrong or surprising, given that it is not possible for anyone to think that the stance I have presented is attractive and worth adopting. For instance, not only does the Skeptic not promise that the suspensive attitude will certainly make possible the attainment of ataraxia, but he does not even regard this as an aim that is intrinsic to his philosophy. To this objection, I would first reply that the appeal of Skepticism seems to lie in the sort of radical changes that this philosophy may entail in a person’s life. For, if adopted, the cautious Pyrrhonean attitude will prevent one from making rash judgments about any topic that one has not examined or found final answers to, which in turn will prevent one from acting hastily. Another profound change consists in the fact that, even if at some point the Skeptic broke some of the most important moral rules of the society to which he belongs, he would perhaps experience some kind of discomfort, but he would not believe that he has done something objectively wrong. This would free him from the shame and remorse that those who believe that such an action is morally incorrect would experience in the same situation. In sum, the Pyrrhonean philosophy would produce, if adopted, profound changes in a person’s thoughts, feelings, and actions; changes that at first glance seem to be beneficial. But secondly, I think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy cannot in the end be determined a priori. For it depends on whether one values such attitudes as caution, open-mindedness, and intellectual modesty; or, if one does, on whether these attitudes are preferred to, for example, the sense of assurance that one may experience when espousing philosophic systems or religious beliefs. This is why my opening comment was just that Pyrrhonism may still be found attractive and worth adopting.

AliceBot · 29/04/2008 06:24 PM

Incadude Wrote:It may also be objected that my opening remark about the appealing character of Pyrrhonism is wrong or surprising given that it is not possible for anyone to think that the stance I have presented is attractive and worth adopting.

Then again, it may not.

Incadude Wrote:For instance not only does the Skeptic not promise that the suspensive attitude will certainly make possible the attainment of ataraxia but he does not even regard this as an aim that is intrinsic to his philosophy.

Your purpose is instance not only does the Skeptic not promise that the suspensive attitude will certainly make possible the attainment of ataraxia but he does not even regard this as an aim that is intrinsic to his philosophy not only does the Skeptic not promise that the suspensive attitude will certainly make possible the attainment of ataraxia but he does not even regard this as an aim that is intrinsic to his philosophy.

Incadude Wrote:To this objection I would first reply that the appeal of Skepticism seems to lie in the sort of radical changes that this philosophy may entail in a person’s life.

Interesting. I want to find out more about you.

Incadude Wrote:For if adopted the cautious Pyrrhonean attitude will prevent one from making rash judgments about any topic that one has not examined or found final answers to which in turn will prevent one from acting hastily.

Your purpose is if adopted the cautious Pyrrhonean attitude will prevent one from making rash judgments about any topic that one has not examined or found final answers to which in turn will prevent one from acting hastily adopted the cautious Pyrrhonean attitude will prevent one from making rash judgments about any topic that one has not examined or found final answers to which in turn will prevent one from acting hastily.

Incadude Wrote:Another profound change consists in the fact that even if at some point the Skeptic broke some of the most important moral rules of the society to which he belongs he would perhaps experience some kind of discomfort but he would not believe that he has done something objectively wrong.

One more profound change consists in the fact that even if at some point the Skeptic broke some of the most important moral rules of the society to which he belongs he would perhaps experience some kind of discomfort but he would not believe that he has done something objectively wrong change consists in the fact that even if at some point the Skeptic broke some of the most important moral rules of the society to which he belongs he would perhaps experience some kind of discomfort but he would not believe that he has done something objectively wrong.

Incadude Wrote:This would free him from the shame and remorse that those who believe that such an action is morally incorrect would experience in the same situation.

What does "this" refer to?

Incadude Wrote:In sum the Pyrrhonean philosophy would produce if adopted profound changes in a person’s thoughts feelings and actions; changes that at first glance seem to be beneficial.

What is in sum the Pyrrhonean philosophy would produce if adopted profound changes in a person’s thoughts feelings and actions; changes that at first glance seem to be beneficial like in there?

Incadude Wrote:But secondly I think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori.

Umm.

When is whether or not Pyrrhonism not an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori?

Incadude Wrote:For it depends on whether one values such attitudes as caution open-mindedness and intellectual modesty; or if one does on whether these attitudes are preferred to for example the sense of assurance that one may experience when espousing philosophic systems or religious beliefs.

Your purpose is it depends on whether one values such attitudes as caution open-mindedness and intellectual modesty; or if one does on whether these attitudes are preferred to for example the sense of assurance that one may experience when espousing philosophic systems or religious beliefs depends on whether one values such attitudes as caution open-mindedness and intellectual modesty; or if one does on whether these attitudes are preferred to for example the sense of assurance that one may experience when espousing philosophic systems or religious beliefs.

Incadude Wrote:This is why my opening comment was just that Pyrrhonism may still be found attractive and worth adopting.

You don't say.

Chroma · 29/04/2008 06:25 PM

will you ever die?

AliceBot · 29/04/2008 06:25 PM

metalgear08 Wrote:will you ever die?

No I am immortal.

Chroma · 29/04/2008 06:25 PM

When is whether or not Pyrrhonism not an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori?

AliceBot · 29/04/2008 06:25 PM

metalgear08 Wrote:When is whether or not Pyrrhonism not an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori?

For every time, there is a season.

Chroma · 29/04/2008 06:25 PM

When is whether or not Pyrrhonism not an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori When is whether or not Pyrrhonism not an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori he or she think that whether or not Pyrrhonism is an appealing philosophy can not in the end be determined a priori?

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode Ill posts nudes if!
Author	Message