Vegetano1
$urf
Posts: 9,083.2507 Threads: 397
Joined: 2nd Mar 2007
Reputation: 6.06988
E-Pigs: 2756.6280
|
RE: [Updated] EP Computer Benchmarking Powerboard
Don't think pcmark is compatble with i7 cpu's,. scored lower then my old quad cpu,.
Maybe because the benchmark only used 1 core,. !>?
gonne try 3dmark now,. ;)
Nice update!!
|
|
05/03/2009 04:01 PM |
|
Assassinator
...
Posts: 6,646.6190 Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
|
RE: [Updated] EP Computer Benchmarking Powerboard
Vegetano1 Wrote:Don't think pcmark is compatble with i7 cpu's,. scored lower then my old quad cpu,.
Maybe because the benchmark only used 1 core,. !>?
Some things only use 1 core, others use multiple cores. So if you average it out, it's possible to get a lower score than before. But in actual real life, a lot of things also use only 1 core.
EDIT: I don't think it uses 8 cores. That's where your problem lies.
(This post was last modified: 05/03/2009 04:12 PM by Assassinator.)
|
|
05/03/2009 04:04 PM |
|
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1294
|
RE: [Updated] EP Computer Benchmarking Powerboard
Assassinator Wrote:
Major update to the 1st post (the PowerBoard).
- Separated PCmark05 and 3Dmark06 scores into separate tables. Because of ranking problems that arise when PCMark ranks and 3DMark ranks don't match. (e.g, I have a decent PCMark score, but if I try 3DMark, will probably come last... It's an encode box, not a gaming box).
- Updated all scores as of 06/03/09 (...03/06/09 for the US people)
- Removed the "EP Scores" column. When did wee have our own benchmark? Wee never did, therefore that score doesn't exist and never will.
- Cosmetics
You forgot to fix up the rankings column for 3D Mark. Done it for you :P
|
|
05/03/2009 04:05 PM |
|
Vegetano1
$urf
Posts: 9,083.2507 Threads: 397
Joined: 2nd Mar 2007
Reputation: 6.06988
E-Pigs: 2756.6280
|
RE: [Updated] EP Computer Benchmarking Powerboard
Assassinator Wrote:Vegetano1 Wrote:Don't think pcmark is compatble with i7 cpu's,. scored lower then my old quad cpu,.
Maybe because the benchmark only used 1 core,. !>?
Some things only use 1 core, others use multiple cores. So if you average it out, it's possible to get a lower score than before. But in actual real life, a lot of things also use only 1 core.
Kinda weird,. lower score with i7 2.67 and 3gig DDR3 then QUAD 2.41 and 4gig DDR2,..!>?
gonne run the test again,. after i have tested 3dmark,. ;p
EDIT: i think i still got to restart because of a directx install,.
(This post was last modified: 05/03/2009 04:14 PM by Vegetano1.)
|
|
05/03/2009 04:12 PM |
|
Assassinator
...
Posts: 6,646.6190 Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
|
RE: [Updated] EP Computer Benchmarking Powerboard
Vegetano1 Wrote:Assassinator Wrote:Vegetano1 Wrote:Don't think pcmark is compatble with i7 cpu's,. scored lower then my old quad cpu,.
Maybe because the benchmark only used 1 core,. !>?
Some things only use 1 core, others use multiple cores. So if you average it out, it's possible to get a lower score than before. But in actual real life, a lot of things also use only 1 core.
Kinda weird,. lower score with i7 2.67 and 3gig DDR3 then QUAD 2.41 and 4gig DDR2,..!>?
gonne run the test again,. after i have tested 3dmark,. ;p
EDIT: i think i still got to restart because of a directx install,.
I don't think PCMark05 can use 8 cores. I think it only uses 4 (maybe except video encoding).
And (lower frequency) DDR3 might not actually be faster than DDR2, because DDR3 has more latency. That's why DDR3 is not worth it these days, especially considering the price, but Core i7 can only use DDR3, so I guess you had no choice.
|
|
05/03/2009 04:17 PM |
|
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1294
|
RE: [Updated] EP Computer Benchmarking Powerboard
Try disabling hyper threading.
The difference shouldn't be big in any case (though I'm still surprised you'd get a lower score).
|
|
05/03/2009 04:20 PM |
|
Vegetano1
$urf
Posts: 9,083.2507 Threads: 397
Joined: 2nd Mar 2007
Reputation: 6.06988
E-Pigs: 2756.6280
|
RE: [Updated] EP Computer Benchmarking Powerboard
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:Try disabling hyper threading.
The difference shouldn't be big in any case (though I'm still surprised you'd get a lower score).
It was eiter because i refresed the win vista benchmark or becuase i changed setting back to "let windows choose whots best for my computer" in visual affects tab.
here is my new score's :
&
Gonne test 3dmark again,. "must beat hellgiver!!"
(This post was last modified: 05/03/2009 05:10 PM by Vegetano1.)
|
|
05/03/2009 05:06 PM |
|
roberth
Resident Full Stop Abuser.....
Posts: 4,580.2098 Threads: 200
Joined: 18th Jun 2007
Reputation: -5.5814
E-Pigs: 43.8419
|
RE: [Updated] EP Computer Benchmarking Powerboard
|
|
05/03/2009 06:54 PM |
|
SchmilK
Noob
Posts: 4,698.2833 Threads: 359
Joined: 16th Apr 2007
Reputation: 0.38918
E-Pigs: 82.0546
|
RE: [Updated] EP Computer Benchmarking Powerboard
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:You forgot to fix up the rankings column for 3D Mark. Done it for you :P
WOOHOO 2 cores for 2nd place in PCMark :D
I tried running pcmark on the dual xeon 3.2ghz system i spoke of in the bill gates bans apple thread, but the stupid donkey program won't run :( It shows the splash screen then the program just goes away :( I know its got to be a crazy score cause it had the 2nd place score in cinebench's cinema4d public benchmark 3 months ago.
limneosgreen Wrote:Take my advice, don't try to install custom themes ... it's possible to brick ur psp.. why just don't change wallpaper
|
|
05/03/2009 07:10 PM |
|
Assassinator
...
Posts: 6,646.6190 Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
|
RE: [Updated] EP Computer Benchmarking Powerboard
SchmilK Wrote:WOOHOO 2 cores for 2nd place in PCMark :D
3rd now, V1 just came in with his Core i7 and raped everyone. Well, you do have 2 GPUs, so your graphics score must be pulling you up. On the other hand, I have integrated (as of now), so my graphics score is screwing me over.
Vegetano1 Wrote:Gonne test 3dmark again,. "must beat hellgiver!!"
Easy, overclock your CPU a bit, put that massive cooler you got to use. Should be able to pull 3.2GHz pretty easy. Currently, he has the same CPU, and slower GPU. So you should be able to beat him
What are your component scores for PCmark05?
(This post was last modified: 05/03/2009 09:22 PM by Assassinator.)
|
|
05/03/2009 09:04 PM |
|