Post Reply 
Connect 4 (Assassinator VS Zinga)
Author Message
Assassinator
...

Posts: 6,646.6190
Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
Offline
Post: #30
RE: Connect 4 (Assassinator VS Zinga)
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:Actually, this would be much faster :P

| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | |X| | |
| | |X|O|O|O|O|
| | |X|O|O|O|O|
| | |O|X|O|X| |
| |X|O|X|X|X|O|

No.... remember i said if X decided to stall for as long as possible.

If X stalls by doing this:


| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | |X| |X| | |
| | |X|O|O| | |
| | |X|O|O|O| |
| | |O|X|O|X| |
| |X|O|X|X|X|O|

Then the sequence i gave is the fastest, (and only) method to win.




You're assuming X does something random, for which your method is still by no way the fastest.

This would be much faster.


| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | |O|X| | |
| | |X|O|O| | |
| | |X|O|O|O|O|
| | |O|X|O|X|O|
| |X|O|X|X|X|O|


And if u assume X does something stupid, then it's instant win.


| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | |X| | |
| | |X|O|O| | |
| | |X|O|O|O|O|
| | |O|X|O|X|X|
| |X|O|X|X|X|O|
(This post was last modified: 23/10/2007 04:45 PM by Assassinator.)
23/10/2007 04:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Connect 4 (Assassinator VS Zinga) - Assassinator - 23/10/2007 04:44 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme: