(15/03/2011 06:04 PM)Vegetano1 Wrote:  the problem is they already made these docu's,......(weird assumptions/believe's) and there for can't be excused anymore being wrong,..

The problem is that you think the ideas are weird or strange.  You've got a bit of a presumption on that, and you're finding it difficult to not consider them to be weird or strange.
Going against popular belief may be what you consider strange or weird

(15/03/2011 06:04 PM)Vegetano1 Wrote:  i can't really link this with the world being flat or round,. you had lost me there,. ;p

...it's because hundreds of years ago, the idea that the world was round would be considered strange or weird.
Just because something may not be in popular belief doesn't mean it's simply just wrong.

(15/03/2011 06:04 PM)Vegetano1 Wrote:  i was about to say that there is 1% change that 911 is/was some secret US cover-up plan to start some new-world something something,..

But is it 1%?  Or would it be 20%?  50%?  0.0001%?
What are chances being based upon?  Motivation?  If so, then the best way to judge is to take into consideration the motivations of those who are potentially behind the bombings.  Which is what these documentaries try to show (whether or not they do it objectively, or even how accurate they are, is another matter).

(15/03/2011 06:04 PM)Vegetano1 Wrote:  but there isn't,.. there are facts about whot really happened and those facts are undeniable,..  they are undeniable facts,..

And I don't think the documentaries deny the facts.
What is not fact, however, is who was behind the attacks.  And that is what's being debated here, not whether the bombings ever occurred or not.