Psyko12 Wrote:edit: 7z doesn't compress better than winrar. I googled some benchmarks, and it turns out that winrar beats 7z, winzip etc...

Depends on what stuff.  But on most things, 7z > winrar.


And a lot of these benchmarks are retarded (either retarded settings or retarded test files).  Here's a non-retarded benchmark, as you can see, each are better at different stuff.

diego Wrote:Theres that KGB archiver that would take hours to compress and decompress.
But it did shrink stuff by a lot.
http://kgbarchiver.net/

PAQ compression is like SLOWWWW, and practically unusable in normal circumstances because of how SLOOWWW it is.

(This post was last modified: 30/01/2010 06:47 PM by Assassinator.)