Heartless141 Wrote:you should, really really should get a ps3 sometimes this year.

It's not the finance or fanboyism that's the problem.  It's because I won't be able to use it much at all, so not really worth it.  My parents HATE me playing games, and a lot of the time there's also someone else on that large plasma TV in the lounge room.  (The only other TV in the house is in my parents room... good luck with that.  EDIT: actually, there's another TV in the kitchen as well, but can't set up any consoles on that, not enough space).  PC gaming is sort of fine because the computer's in a way less public location compared to the TV, and it's not as obvious that I'm gaming (easy to alt+tab in the times it takes someone to open the door and walk around the bend to see the computer).

Heartless141 Wrote:also, RPGs, like DMC and stuffs, not Fallout or anything. work better with the dualshock. no exception there.

Yeah, for RPGs, controllers probably better.

Heartless141 Wrote:FPS does have more advantages with mouse and keyboard. but Analogs has its advantages too. the consistent moving speed of the crosshair. you can do it with with the mouse, but simply harder.

Don't really see how that's useful, maybe only very few and far between instances.  Mouse moves the crosshair to exactly were you need with extreme precision and speed (from years of practice when using Windows normally), that's pretty much exactly what you need with FPS'.

Also I've seen RTS' on consoles before... how to effectively micro your units with an analog controller is still a mystery to me.  Also no hotkeys, unit groupings and such.

(This post was last modified: 12/01/2010 08:09 AM by Assassinator.)