If multiple people are to do reviews, wee could get very inaccurate ratings, so wee would have to standardize a rating system, otherwise it'll get poo poo.

some suggestions

1. Create a standard ranking criteria, like 10=perfect - 5=average - 0=as good as watching a blank screen. The problem with this is that everyone's view of what's "good" is different. So i suggest a standardized method, such as a, b or c.

a. Have each reviewer rate each show reviewed by each other reviewer so that each reviewed show has ratings by each reviewer, and then average these scores to get a score standard to all reviewers.

b. One way around people rating differently is to ask people to undergo a mental standardization process, where they compare the anime they're rating agaisnt other anime they've seen, and rate as thought the average of all the anime they've seen is 5 (or something else, like 7). So if that anime is better than the average they've seen, higher, and worse, lower. That way, at least the average is standardized.

c. The same process as 2, but instead of each reviewer, make it each person, in other words, create a poll! and average the ratings.


Whatever way, wee should make the ratings all standard. Sites which have fudgeed up ratings systems which piss be off.

@Blu, u rate pretty harsh... actually, so do i ^.^

And i suggest everyone to rate harsh, this way, it;s possible to separate the extremely good from the really good from the normal good. If 90% of the ratings are higher than 9, then the whole systems fudges up. (and the fact that it's very unrealistic, unless your the kind of really optimistic person who feels everything u watch is a perfect masterpiece) Wee want the average to be more like 5-7, not 9.


So what do u guys say?

(This post was last modified: 26/07/2007 07:45 PM by Assassinator.)