Wolf
Frolicking towards Zinga
Posts: 2,411.1780 Threads: 277
Joined: 4th May 2007
Reputation: -2.56923
E-Pigs: 51.9285
|
RE: Rate the usefulness of the above post
-100/5
Scientific approaches and theories
Where scientists and philosophers converge on the quest for the meaning of life is an assumption that the mechanics of life (i.e., the universe) are determinable, thus the meaning of life may eventually be derived through our understanding of the mechanics of the universe in which wee live, including the mechanics of the human body.
There are, however, strictly speaking, no scientific views on the meaning of biological life other than its observable biological function: to continue. In this regard, science simply addresses quantitative questions such as: "What does it do?", "By what means?", and "To what extent?", rather than the "For what purpose?".
[edit] Science and the five questions
But, like philosophy, science doesn't rest when it comes to asking and answering questions, and scientists have tackled each of the five interpretations of the meaning of life question head-on, attempting to answer each from the perspective of what exists, or in relation to the human being (for which science itself serves), offering empirical answers from relevant scientific fields...
[edit] What is the nature of life (and of the universe in which wee live)?
Toward answering "What is the nature of life (and of the universe in which wee live)?", scientists have proposed various theories or worldviews over the centuries, including the heliocentric view by Copernicus and Galileo, through the mechanistic clockwork universe of Ren
|
|
17/05/2007 07:41 AM |
|