Post Reply 
Booting Windows XP - RAM vs HDD
Author Message
Vegetano1
$urf

Posts: 9,083.2507
Threads: 397
Joined: 2nd Mar 2007
Reputation: 6.06988
E-Pigs: 2756.6280
Offline
Post: #8
RE: Booting Windows XP - RAM vs HDD
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:
Vegetano1 Wrote:That's a very fast boot/start-up,. O_O!

does look liek he is starting from boot,..

in his specs it says Core v1 (SATAII) the drive i "wanted" to buy is V2 but if OCZ is crapy brand i try and find a nother brand,..

want to buy the best SSD,.. because i don't have to much $$$$ ;p

Hope there will be new SSDs soon!!
The Titan will easy beat the OCZ anyway.
If it's a true boot, he must've ripped out a heapload of drivers or something.  Typically, you'll only be adding drivers to a stock Windows install, and I can tell you that 800MHz RAM running in dual channel is far faster than any SSD RAID setup out there.  Yet still, he's getting slightly faster boot times than I am.
I'm quite confident that I could beat his with a stripped XP booting from RAM, but that wasn't the point of the test here :P

i get the point you trying to make,. SSD is't much faster as expected,.

prob is a true boot,. and yes he prob got a different set-up,. he also prob got the same time difference if he did the same test you did,. ;p

(V1 waits and see whot the best SSD buy is,. )


Make loads of $$!! it wurks!!
[Image: csbanner_anim_03.gif]
Signed Homebrew by bsanehi & OMightyBuggy
http://endlessparadigm.com/forum/showthr...?tid=25707
Spoiler for My miniBlog:
18/01/2009 06:32 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Booting Windows XP - RAM vs HDD - Vegetano1 - 18/01/2009 06:32 AM
RE: Booting Windows XP - RAM vs HDD - S7* - 18/01/2009, 06:53 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme: