Post Reply 
Booting Windows XP - RAM vs HDD
Author Message
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative

Posts: 17,022.2988
Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1274
Offline
Post: #7
RE: Booting Windows XP - RAM vs HDD
Vegetano1 Wrote:That's a very fast boot/start-up,. O_O!

does look liek he is starting from boot,..

in his specs it says Core v1 (SATAII) the drive i "wanted" to buy is V2 but if OCZ is crapy brand i try and find a nother brand,..

want to buy the best SSD,.. because i don't have to much $$$$ ;p

Hope there will be new SSDs soon!!
The Titan will easy beat the OCZ anyway.
If it's a true boot, he must've ripped out a heapload of drivers or something.  Typically, you'll only be adding drivers to a stock Windows install, and I can tell you that 800MHz RAM running in dual channel is far faster than any SSD RAID setup out there.  Yet still, he's getting slightly faster boot times than I am.
I'm quite confident that I could beat his with a stripped XP booting from RAM, but that wasn't the point of the test here :P
18/01/2009 03:47 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Booting Windows XP - RAM vs HDD - ZiNgA BuRgA - 18/01/2009 03:47 AM
RE: Booting Windows XP - RAM vs HDD - S7* - 18/01/2009, 06:53 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme: