Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

ZiNgA BuRgA · 22/10/2007 04:45 AM

| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | |X|O| | | |
| | |O|X|O| | |
| | |O|X|X|X| |

Assassinator · 22/10/2007 04:46 AM

ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:

| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | |X|O| | | |
| | |O|X|O| | |
| | |O|X|X|X|O|

hibbyware · 22/10/2007 04:47 AM

Results from ℋiЬЬyℬot™ - "better than Google"

Assassinator Wrote:Wonder if there is opening theory or something for this...

Connect Four has been solved by James D. Allen (1 October, 1988), and independently by Victor Allis (16 October, 1988)[1]. With perfect play, the first player can force a win by starting in the middle column. Starting in the two adjacent columns allows the second player to reach a draw; starting with the four outer columns even allows the second player to force a win.

Assassinator · 22/10/2007 04:48 AM

hibbyware Wrote:
Assassinator Wrote:Wonder if there is opening theory or something for this...

Connect Four has been solved by James D. Allen (1 October, 1988), and independently by Victor Allis (16 October, 1988)[1]. With perfect play, the first player can force a win by starting in the middle column. Starting in the two adjacent columns allows the second player to reach a draw; starting with the four outer columns even allows the second player to force a win.

D:

ZiNgA BuRgA · 22/10/2007 04:52 AM

| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | |X| | | | |
| | |X|O| | | |
| | |O|X|O| | |
| | |O|X|X|X|O|

hibbyware Wrote:
Assassinator Wrote:Wonder if there is opening theory or something for this...

Connect Four has been solved by James D. Allen (1 October, 1988), and independently by Victor Allis (16 October, 1988)[1]. With perfect play, the first player can force a win by starting in the middle column. Starting in the two adjacent columns allows the second player to reach a draw; starting with the four outer columns even allows the second player to force a win.

Crazy people...

Assassinator · 22/10/2007 05:03 AM

| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | |X|O| | | |
| | |X|O| | | |
| | |O|X|O| | |
| | |O|X|X|X|O|

ZiNgA BuRgA · 22/10/2007 05:06 AM

| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | |X|O| | | |
| | |X|O| | | |
| | |O|X|O| | |
| |X|O|X|X|X|O|

Lol, this game looks stuck.

Assassinator · 22/10/2007 05:09 AM

| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | |X|O| | | |
| | |X|O|O| | |
| | |O|X|O| | |
| |X|O|X|X|X|O|

Assassinator · 22/10/2007 05:22 AM

As long as both players think a bit, and don't act like idiots, it would most likely end up in a draw.

Unlike chess, this is too simple and unless someone makes a big mistake, u generally can't win. If u think before u move, u shouldn't make a big mistake. U need a multi-win combo for victory, but these are easy to spot as they are taking shape.

ZiNgA BuRgA · 22/10/2007 05:24 AM

| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | |X|O| | | |
| | |X|O|O| | |
| | |O|X|O|X| |
| |X|O|X|X|X|O|

Damn, I have to go to bed soon.

Assassinator Wrote:As long as both players think a bit, and don't act like idiots, it would most likely end up in a draw.

Unlike chess, this is too simple and big mistakes are easily visible if u think before making the move. U need a combo for victory, but these are easy to spot as well.

Yeah. But then, you can't really play chess like this :P
(then you have cheaters >_>)

You have the advantage in this game though.

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode Connect 4 (Assassinator VS Zinga)
Author	Message