Post Reply 
TorrentSpy court ruling.
And more proof that judges are idiots.
Author Message
Peacefully Disturbed
Completely Useless

Posts: 220.9250
Threads: 9
Joined: 29th Apr 2007
Reputation: 3.37413
E-Pigs: 1.0248
Offline
Post: #11
RE: TorrentSpy court ruling.
I never signed up either, but it is one of the torrents sites that I use pretty frequently.  I'm certain that the judge who made the ruling has no idea how RAM works in a computer, and it will probably get overturned when it is challenged (hopefully).  It is very disturbing how blindly judges make these types of rulings though, eventually its really going to fudge something up.

I'm not disappointed in you, I'm disappointed in myself, for believing in you.
[Image: peacefullydisturbedsignx8.png]
Did you park in a handicap spot? - No, I parked in two, I don't want any cripples scratching my car!
(This post was last modified: 15/06/2007 07:41 PM by Peacefully Disturbed.)
15/06/2007 07:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative

Posts: 17,022.2988
Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1274
Offline
Post: #12
RE: TorrentSpy court ruling.
^ Yeah, it's kinda funny thinking that they make those decisions.
So what happens if they can't provide RAM data?  Get sued?  If that happens, random people will be suing random other people for not keeping records of their RAM - it'll be lolz.
15/06/2007 08:13 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ge64
Former Admin ;)

Posts: 3,163.4170
Threads: 295
Joined: 3rd Feb 2007
Reputation: 0.38918
E-Pigs: 108.4795
Offline
Post: #13
RE: TorrentSpy court ruling.
anyway i never used it and now i never will. mpaa r a bunch of fudgeers but they will lose in the end.

[Image: ub1985584.jpg]
15/06/2007 08:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme: