hellobonacua Wrote:

diego Wrote:Yes tetris. But tell me. Do you think the sig would look better with or without flow.

hey what's a flow sorry im really noob in photoshop

flow is something of how the picture flows together (like the lightining is correct, effects blend in, anything that makes it seem realistic) so bad flow would be the demonstration of what unfortunately, your sig displays; the effects don't work at all and theres no sense of lighting

its not a bad thing though sometimes, but i must i agree you need to work on it with this one

(This post was last modified: 21/05/2008 01:31 AM by Tetris999.)

Tetris999 Wrote:its not like you NEED flow to everything you make, its like following a stream of sigs that are all the same way with the same thought "oh damn i need flow/render/focal/lighting"

what if something doesn't need flow/render/focal/lighting and is better without? I for one thinks that these things aren't needed in every single signature that is ever made

that's the greatest thing you've ever said.

hellobonacua Wrote:

diego Wrote:Yes tetris. But tell me. Do you think the sig would look better with or without flow.

hey what's a flow sorry im really noob in photoshop

6.

to come or go as in a stream: A constant stream of humanity flowed by.
7.

to proceed continuously and smoothly: Melody flowed from the violin.
8.

to hang loosely at full length: Her hair flowed over her shoulders.
9.

to abound in something: The tavern flowed with wine.
10.

to rise and advance, as the tide.

(This post was last modified: 21/05/2008 01:43 AM by S7*.)

(This post was last modified: 21/05/2008 01:54 AM by hellobonacua.)