11/04/2013, 05:41 AM
This is going to be a quick one because I need some sleep.
I was just scratching my head over if I'm just being ignorant or whether an operating system, namely windows, is objectively bad for what I do.
At the moment I main linux, but problems with ATI cards (yes, it doesn't render spoon as fast as it should and it has tearing issues, these problems aren't apparent under windows) and lack of commercial software support, namely video GAEMS/photoshop/painter etc, is just driving me up a wall.
One of the things I've come across is namely the "problems" with operating systems are not really the operating systems themselves but just in part with the users ignorance. I guess you can apply this to a lot situations/people where they defer incompetence to an object instead of looking for a solution due to their misunderstanding of the system.
There's no way windows can be the most used operating system because it's popular, I just feel like I'm doing it wrong.
Some of the things I enjoy about linux:
- IT related tasks are a snap with shell scripting
- Package managers are awesome
- Programming in general is so...fluid, coupled with shell scripting, it makes compiling, writing and testing really easy. Per example: compile && execute program, I don't know how to do that under windows cmd
- Windows tiling is great, windows can detect each others edges, easy to line up things, etc. I don't recall this in windows, maybe I've missed it somewhere (CAN YOU FOLLOW THE CONTEXT, EH EH EH?)
- I like gnome3
- Easily customized with different desktop environments/window managers and the best part is, NO_FUCKING_PATCHES.
- It is not a clusterfudge to understand (ok this is a jab at windows, but mainly one of the reasons why I use linux is that it comes pretty naturally to me as opposed with all the spoon windows employs)
Am I just too ignorant to find such features in windows? I know there is vim for windows but that's in a GUI and it's not even contained in the terminal from what I recall (I use vim from the terminal). There's also powershell, but that lacks GNU tools and utilities + it has a funky methodology in shell scripting (which seems all right, but not something I want to really adopt since it's missing out on the former) so that's another eh.
I could just use MAC OS X but fudge the company behind that operating system, personally I like what the operating system is, but I don't support the ideology behind it. It also is another clusterfudge of patching to get the required functionality (from what I've read anyway). If linux had the commercial support it had, that'd be awesome, then again, that just wouldn't be linux now would it?
So yeah, can I be as productive in Windows as I am in Linux? Right now I just can't see that, but I want to be.
I was just scratching my head over if I'm just being ignorant or whether an operating system, namely windows, is objectively bad for what I do.
At the moment I main linux, but problems with ATI cards (yes, it doesn't render spoon as fast as it should and it has tearing issues, these problems aren't apparent under windows) and lack of commercial software support, namely video GAEMS/photoshop/painter etc, is just driving me up a wall.
One of the things I've come across is namely the "problems" with operating systems are not really the operating systems themselves but just in part with the users ignorance. I guess you can apply this to a lot situations/people where they defer incompetence to an object instead of looking for a solution due to their misunderstanding of the system.
There's no way windows can be the most used operating system because it's popular, I just feel like I'm doing it wrong.
Some of the things I enjoy about linux:
- IT related tasks are a snap with shell scripting
- Package managers are awesome
- Programming in general is so...fluid, coupled with shell scripting, it makes compiling, writing and testing really easy. Per example: compile && execute program, I don't know how to do that under windows cmd
- Windows tiling is great, windows can detect each others edges, easy to line up things, etc. I don't recall this in windows, maybe I've missed it somewhere (CAN YOU FOLLOW THE CONTEXT, EH EH EH?)
- I like gnome3
fork da haterz
- Easily customized with different desktop environments/window managers and the best part is, NO_FUCKING_PATCHES.
- It is not a clusterfudge to understand (ok this is a jab at windows, but mainly one of the reasons why I use linux is that it comes pretty naturally to me as opposed with all the spoon windows employs)
Am I just too ignorant to find such features in windows? I know there is vim for windows but that's in a GUI and it's not even contained in the terminal from what I recall (I use vim from the terminal). There's also powershell, but that lacks GNU tools and utilities + it has a funky methodology in shell scripting (which seems all right, but not something I want to really adopt since it's missing out on the former) so that's another eh.
I could just use MAC OS X but fudge the company behind that operating system, personally I like what the operating system is, but I don't support the ideology behind it. It also is another clusterfudge of patching to get the required functionality (from what I've read anyway). If linux had the commercial support it had, that'd be awesome, then again, that just wouldn't be linux now would it?
So yeah, can I be as productive in Windows as I am in Linux? Right now I just can't see that, but I want to be.