Xitherun Wrote:ProperBritish Wrote:with AdBlock+ now Chrome is pure awzum, i do like the fox though. but i don't like bloating up my HDD with loads of what do the same thing.
does EasyList actually work for you? It doesn't seem to work for me. :(
it's still in early beta, but yeah i find it to be a little sub par
Assassinator Wrote:And all you Chrome people, tell me some valid reason why you think Chrome is better.
After using Chrome for so long, FX's UI annoy's the spoon out of me. It's so clunky, and outdated.
And I like it's speed. When I click the icon, it loads pretty much instantly, whereas FX would take a few seconds.
Funnybutrandom Wrote:Xitherun Wrote:ProperBritish Wrote:with AdBlock+ now Chrome is pure awzum, i do like the fox though. but i don't like bloating up my HDD with loads of what do the same thing.
does EasyList actually work for you? It doesn't seem to work for me. :(
it's still in early beta, but yeah i find it to be a little sub par
it doesn't work as well, i use the Germany one + EasyList (second one)
Xitherun Wrote:Assassinator Wrote:And all you Chrome people, tell me some valid reason why you think Chrome is better.
After using Chrome for so long, FX's UI annoy's the spoon out of me. It's so clunky, and outdated.
And I like it's speed. When I click the icon, it loads pretty much instantly, whereas FX would take a few seconds.
it does what you need, does it elegantly with maximum screenspace available. No bar at the bottom you don't need, tabs integrated into the bar with maximise, minimise and close on it. Simple, hard to make tacky theming and the best address bar ive ever used.
if you visit a site often enough, you can press tab while typing the address to search it before even starting to load the page.
Assassinator Wrote:And all you Chrome people, tell me some valid reason why you think Chrome is better.
I don't need to, i like chrome, you like ff, end of.
Xitherun Wrote:After using Chrome for so long, FX's UI annoy's the spoon out of me. It's so clunky, and outdated.
I've only ever used Chrome for about 3 days (when it 1st came out), and it sort of didn't impress me that much. Maybe I'll give it another try sometime, since it's supposed to be much better now.
ProperBritish Wrote:it does what you need, does it elegantly with maximum screenspace available. No bar at the bottom you don't need, tabs integrated into the bar with maximise, minimise and close on it. Simple, hard to make tacky theming and the best address bar ive ever used.
Fair enough.
Xitherun Wrote:And I like it's speed. When I click the icon, it loads pretty much instantly, whereas FX would take a few seconds.
A few seconds is an over exaggeration, not even IE takes a few seconds to load.
I generally keep my web browser open the whole time, so only really need to open it once at the start, so no big deal anyway.
EDIT: Tried it, takes about 1 second for the window to pop up, another 0.5 seconds or so until it's completely ready for use. Heh, portable Firefox from USB takes me like 5+ seconds to load.
Funnybutrandom Wrote:Assassinator Wrote:And all you Chrome people, tell me some valid reason why you think Chrome is better.
I don't need to, i like chrome, you like ff, end of.
Just interested in people's reasons, because when I first tried Chrome back then, it didn't impress me much at all. Not trying to bash you or anything, otherwise I'll make it goddamn obvious that I am.
But if you want to fight, bring it. And if you're trying to prove your case, wouldn't it be better if you actually come up with a few reasons? This just makes you sound like a baseless Google fanboy (and fanboy = stupid, regardless of your object of fandom).
Assassinator Wrote:Xitherun Wrote:And I like it's speed. When I click the icon, it loads pretty much instantly, whereas FX would take a few seconds.
A few seconds is an over exaggeration, not even IE takes a few seconds to load.
actually, it's not an exaggeration at all. FX would take me a few seconds to open, whereas Chrome is next to instant.
Xitherun Wrote:Assassinator Wrote:Xitherun Wrote:And I like it's speed. When I click the icon, it loads pretty much instantly, whereas FX would take a few seconds.
A few seconds is an over exaggeration, not even IE takes a few seconds to load.
actually, it's not an exaggeration at all. FX would take me a few seconds to open, whereas Chrome is next to instant.
Next to an instant is still close to a second.
Xitherun Wrote:Assassinator Wrote:Xitherun Wrote:And I like it's speed. When I click the icon, it loads pretty much instantly, whereas FX would take a few seconds.
A few seconds is an over exaggeration, not even IE takes a few seconds to load.
actually, it's not an exaggeration at all. FX would take me a few seconds to open, whereas Chrome is next to instant.
Tested it, and edited it into the previous post. It only takes like 1 second for me, which isn't too long. Maybe you had too many plugins, that decreases your loading speed.
Quote:Tried it, takes about 1 second for the window to pop up, another 0.5 seconds or so until it's completely ready for use. Heh, portable Firefox from USB takes me like 5+ seconds to load.