Read roberths post, wikipedia is about as reliable a source as a meth head at a chemistry convention.

I understand wikipedia can be edited but that's a lot of
information stating it to be mock... Im not saying it IS,
But Ive never seen anything with Christianity as mock...

Wait for my book to be published.

Check the article now
See (a) how easy it is to0 edit a post
(b) Proof Wikipedia is unreliable

roberth Wrote:Check the article now
See (a) how easy it is to0 edit a post
(b) Proof Wikipedia is unreliable

I stated I know it is easily edited...
I know this.

What Im saying is All of that information telling it to
be a mock... Ive never seen Christianity in wikipedia
to be mock.

If you can find something that you YOURSELF have not
personally edited, I will stand corrected until then.

Ill continue thinking the way I do.

let me reverse that
You prove that FSM wasn't just added to that list by a random person


" I don't share your beliefs, but ill fight to hte death for your right to believe them"

I forget who said it, or if that's even right, but its the general gist of what i mean, and what he meant

roberth Wrote:let me reverse that
You prove that FSM wasn't just added to that list by a random person


" I don't share your beliefs, but ill fight to hte death for your right to believe them"

I forget who said it, or if that's even right, but its the general gist of what i mean, and what he meant

And that's a very good saying.
Keep in mind Im not putting down this belief or
trying to offend anyone Im simpily talking.

If you or anyone here believes how they do.
Go for it. And believe in it. Its your life and your thoughts.

Im not standing up for God or the FSM they are both theroys.

Also, further on this Wikipedia article

wikipedia Wrote:(Some followers of this faith assert that it is a parody religion because their deity chooses it to be so)

So assuming wikipedia is reliable (fat chance) then it is a mock real religion

And i too would read your Book UG....im sure it would be interesting