Slushba132 Wrote:COMPREHENSION ISN'T A REASON TO KILL PEOPLE (good example of bad netiquette)
If you find someone who doesn't speak English are you allowed to kill them because they can't comprehend you?
If you find a cat that is incapable of human communication  are you allowed to kill it because it doesn't understand?!?

The fact is the thoughts and language are there and YOU are the one incapable of comprehending it.

Comprehension has nothing to do with it.
This doesn't have to do with people of other languages or cats.

They are birthed and already live... You don't KILL people for that...

Your missing what Im saying. If its unBORN it doesn't classify as someone of another language.
Its nothing yet...

metalgear08 Wrote:But the thing is, where does it end? Like with partial birth abortion, the baby is partially born. Do you still consider it a "larva"? Or does it have to be fully born? All I'm saying is, where does it end? Do you want the right to kill your newborn if you don't want it 2 weeks after it's born? Or whatif after it's born the mother realizes she can't take care of it?

And like Slushba said, you can't do anything based on comprehension. If a baby can recognize music it heard while inside the womb, what does that mean? It can comprehend that, can't it?

Until its born... its not a life.
That's what Im saying.

And no you don't kill your baby 2 weeks after its born because its BORN already...
Im talking about in the womb. If you use abortion that's nothing like kill a 2 week old baby!