Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[sig] nirvana
Author Message
S7*
Sweet Dreams

Posts: 16,689.4373
Threads: 1,056
Joined: 3rd Apr 2007
Reputation: 14.29926
E-Pigs: 383.2309
Offline
Post: #7
RE: [sig] nirvana
(02/12/2010 08:20 PM)trademark91 Wrote:  
(02/12/2010 07:39 PM)ProperBritish Wrote:  
(02/12/2010 05:52 PM)trademark91 Wrote:  actually its transparency in the image. on a dark background, it looks pretty good.

then put a dark background behind the layer and it will always look like it's on one

well the point is to have it blend with whatever the user is viewing. with a dark background behind it, it just looks like a 500x200 rectangle

i don't like that in a sig. i like using transparency to make the images look good on the background.

It's nice, when it works... but you already said "on a dark background, it looks pretty good" assuming you mean "better than a bright background", so you should sacrifice sophistication for the better looking sig.

Regardless, alt is better.
03/12/2010 02:45 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
[sig] nirvana - trademark91 - 02/12/2010, 11:12 AM
RE: [sig] nirvana - xBu - 02/12/2010, 05:21 PM
RE: [sig] nirvana - trademark91 - 02/12/2010, 05:52 PM
RE: [sig] nirvana - ProperBritish - 02/12/2010, 07:39 PM
RE: [sig] nirvana - trademark91 - 02/12/2010, 08:20 PM
RE: [sig] nirvana - eKusoshisut0 - 02/12/2010, 11:17 PM
RE: [sig] nirvana - S7* - 03/12/2010 02:45 AM
RE: [sig] nirvana - trademark91 - 03/12/2010, 11:01 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme: