(21/04/2010 07:57 AM)S7* Wrote:  ^ What is your objective with this thread? All your saying is let us use ISOs on our Go's? In that case there's nothing to discuss.. were you meant to add a poll or something?

Someone is out for blood...

The objective of this thread is to simply see where everyones opinion is with hacking and enabling a feature as an iso loader for the go. But, wee are discussing or debating the fact that many devs always seem to say when it comes down to this "it'll ruin the game industry." How so? So that's why I'm asking for people to discuss why wee should or shouldn't enable an iso loader.

It all comes down to a simple yes or no for such support or depth of hacking to enable something like this. There's probably a lot of reasons why everyone feels an iso loader would be a great thing to have on the go and there are probably those who would think otherwise. I'm here for pro hacking of the go and custom firmware; sure a poll wouldve been nice, but I wanted to see why many people wanted such a thing not for the simple accusation of "piracy" the public usually gets.

Everyone is discussing their reasons for why they would think an iso loader or cfw would be great for the go; so what do you mean wee can have no discussion? The point of this thread is to simply see where everyone is standing and come to a conclusion; should the go be broken free with a kernel exploit that allows features such as this?

If you pay attention to the dev scene, there are a lot of comments about not enabling kernel access due to piracy.

Edit: added a poll.

(This post was last modified: 21/04/2010 12:48 PM by Tetris999.)