ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:

Senseito URΩBΩROS Wrote:As for you not valuing tragic events....... that's rather tragic in itself. hehe.

Does that mean I can write up a random crappy story full of tragic events and receive a high rating from you?

Absolutely not. you've got to write an excellent story full of tragic events. It might work then.

A series of tragic events wouldn't work. Obviously. A crappy story would create pointlessness. A good story must be able to encapsulate the Tragic Events along with the Characters, Animation and every other aspect of an Anime - into an Anime.

Disturbing the equilibrium is the essence of story making... either from a tragic event ~ or watching Konata eat a chocolate cone.. it's incredible some people consider Lucky Star and Kanon to be of the same calibre because of how different they are.

But it is, all about the story ultimately.

Assassinator Wrote:

Senseito URΩBΩROS Wrote:The tragic occurrences as as "inserted" as the the car in KgNE - you can't do spoon about it - that's the way its written.

In KgNE, the tragic event is simply an event from which the story is launched. In Kanon, the tragic events are the "high points" of the story. So not the same.

I disagree. The high points were the restoration of equilibrium. If it ended with a tragic event..... not only would it be depressing but it wouldn't really have closure until its has been dealt with.

In that aspect both Kanon and KgNE achieve that. Air doesn't.

(This post was last modified: 13/09/2009 05:59 AM by S7*.)