Post Reply 
FatFirefox
Author Message
bstronga
Vimperator

Posts: 457.2241
Threads: 19
Joined: 11th Mar 2007
Reputation: -5.33618
E-Pigs: 22.6748
Offline
Post: #51
RE: FatFirefox
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:I'm still a little curious of Opera.  If you have a number of flash applications open, which use a fair amount of RAM, there's no way Opera can still consume that little RAM.  The only way would be if Opera cached the inactive tabs to the harddrive.  Uses less memory, but it's slower to switch between tabs.  There may also be some concurrency problems...

@bstronga: how can you stand such small tabs?

yup that's probably how opera's memory management works. well at least that's what i think the memory cache setting is for... ;o
which means, yes you can get it even smaller.

uhm you mean how orientation works in this mess?
well there is a system to this mess, notice the locked tabs on the left and favicons are a great help too ;p

edit:
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:Uses less memory, but it's slower to switch between tabs.
no.
(This post was last modified: 12/04/2008 07:26 AM by bstronga.)
12/04/2008 07:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
FatFirefox - S7* - 05/03/2008, 09:35 AM
RE: FatFirefox - Method - 05/03/2008, 09:40 AM
RE: FatFirefox - squee666 - 05/03/2008, 09:41 AM
RE: FatFirefox - Assassinator - 05/03/2008, 02:17 PM
RE: FatFirefox - Kaiser - 05/03/2008, 10:04 AM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 05/03/2008, 10:10 AM
RE: FatFirefox - Method - 05/03/2008, 10:21 AM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 05/03/2008, 10:27 AM
RE: FatFirefox - Chroma - 05/03/2008, 03:31 PM
RE: FatFirefox - roberth - 05/03/2008, 03:44 PM
RE: FatFirefox - andrewcc - 05/03/2008, 03:57 PM
RE: FatFirefox - Assassinator - 05/03/2008, 04:26 PM
RE: FatFirefox - roberth - 05/03/2008, 04:37 PM
RE: FatFirefox - Assassinator - 05/03/2008, 04:39 PM
RE: FatFirefox - PSPkiller - 06/03/2008, 09:05 AM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 06/03/2008, 09:52 AM
RE: FatFirefox - sticky - 08/03/2008, 04:51 AM
RE: FatFirefox - boogschd - 08/03/2008, 09:29 AM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 08/03/2008, 02:28 PM
RE: FatFirefox - boogschd - 08/03/2008, 07:11 PM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 08/03/2008, 07:16 PM
RE: FatFirefox - boogschd - 08/03/2008, 07:25 PM
RE: FatFirefox - NIGathan - 08/03/2008, 07:18 PM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 08/03/2008, 07:21 PM
RE: FatFirefox - NIGathan - 08/03/2008, 07:27 PM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 08/03/2008, 07:26 PM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 08/03/2008, 07:29 PM
RE: FatFirefox - NIGathan - 08/03/2008, 07:37 PM
RE: FatFirefox - J_G_ - 09/03/2008, 04:05 PM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 09/03/2008, 04:18 PM
RE: FatFirefox - ZiNgA BuRgA - 09/03/2008, 10:06 PM
RE: FatFirefox - SkyDX - 14/03/2008, 02:47 PM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 14/03/2008, 03:10 PM
RE: FatFirefox - Assassinator - 14/03/2008, 05:39 PM
RE: FatFirefox - _VEndeTta - 14/03/2008, 03:28 PM
RE: FatFirefox - ZiNgA BuRgA - 14/03/2008, 05:30 PM
RE: FatFirefox - _VEndeTta - 14/03/2008, 08:19 PM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 15/03/2008, 01:15 AM
RE: FatFirefox - Assassinator - 15/03/2008, 01:55 AM
RE: FatFirefox - J_G_ - 15/03/2008, 01:24 AM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 15/03/2008, 01:27 AM
RE: FatFirefox - SkyDX - 15/03/2008, 02:53 AM
RE: FatFirefox - michaelp - 15/03/2008, 01:18 PM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 10/04/2008, 04:06 PM
RE: FatFirefox - bstronga - 10/04/2008, 04:42 PM
RE: FatFirefox - SkyDX - 10/04/2008, 10:03 PM
RE: FatFirefox - bstronga - 11/04/2008, 03:59 AM
RE: FatFirefox - S7* - 11/04/2008, 12:59 AM
RE: FatFirefox - andrewcc - 11/04/2008, 05:38 AM
RE: FatFirefox - ZiNgA BuRgA - 11/04/2008, 09:15 PM
RE: FatFirefox - bstronga - 12/04/2008 07:12 AM
RE: FatFirefox - ZiNgA BuRgA - 12/04/2008, 07:48 AM
RE: FatFirefox - bstronga - 12/04/2008, 02:30 PM
RE: FatFirefox - andrewcc - 12/04/2008, 02:36 PM
RE: FatFirefox - ZiNgA BuRgA - 12/04/2008, 08:00 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme: