Post Reply 
As you probably know, Vista isn't so successful
Author Message
UncertainGod
Illogical mindfuckery

Posts: 1,492.4476
Threads: 88
Joined: 16th Aug 2007
Reputation: -8.70083
E-Pigs: 7.1412
Offline
Post: #11
RE: As you probably know,  Vista isn't so successful
They should just finish the original codebase of longhorn, it had the potential, speed and all round awesomeness (well, except for the sidebar, I fudgeing hate that). Only problem is that the original main longhorn team, with the exception of one or two devlopers all work for Google now.
18/09/2007 10:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
u_c_taker
hacks=drama

Posts: 3,185.2011
Threads: 102
Joined: 29th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.03084
E-Pigs: 36.7855
Offline
Post: #12
RE: As you probably know,  Vista isn't so successful
too bad for ms they r fudgeing dumb i remember the hype of vista during the beta period but on realease it all falls apart

18/09/2007 11:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ix_stylez
("')(O.o)('')

Posts: 758.5250
Threads: 23
Joined: 9th Apr 2007
Reputation: -7.62267
E-Pigs: 8.2221
Offline
Post: #13
RE: As you probably know,  Vista isn't so successful
diego_429 Wrote:I really think (and hope)that Vista SP1 will make it much better and be really stable.

yeah hopefully.. i want my sound back =/

[Image: IxStyleZ.jpg]
18/09/2007 01:48 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ge64
Former Admin ;)

Posts: 3,163.4170
Threads: 295
Joined: 3rd Feb 2007
Reputation: 0.38918
E-Pigs: 108.4795
Offline
Post: #14
RE: As you probably know,  Vista isn't so successful
don't expect too much, anyone remember xp sp1? wasn't that special.

longhorn.tk, was like AAAGES ago, and even that was better than vista is now.

[Image: ub1985584.jpg]
18/09/2007 04:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
diego
poof

Posts: 7,826.1659
Threads: 264
Joined: 22nd Jun 2007
Reputation: 1.80067
E-Pigs: 37.4012
Offline
Post: #15
RE: As you probably know,  Vista isn't so successful
maybe MS learned from what they did with SP1 and 2 for XP , and trying to make SP1 for Vista as stable as XP-SP2

[Image: cce6aa9e-c40c-4ae7-aebe-d7780d6fc009.gif]
18/09/2007 04:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ge64
Former Admin ;)

Posts: 3,163.4170
Threads: 295
Joined: 3rd Feb 2007
Reputation: 0.38918
E-Pigs: 108.4795
Offline
Post: #16
RE: As you probably know,  Vista isn't so successful
ye right

[Image: ub1985584.jpg]
18/09/2007 05:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative

Posts: 17,024.1882
Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1887
Offline
Post: #17
RE: As you probably know,  Vista isn't so successful
UncertainGod Wrote:Besides the only reason I have seen from (less-educated) people to use Vista is 'it's pretty',
Other reasons they claim: "More optimized for dual core" and "More stable".
Fact is, absolutely no test has shown Vista running faster than XP on any setup (some people will continue to blame "lack of certified drivers" (if you ask me, WHQL certification is just Microsoft's ploy to shift blame onto hardware vendors) not being available).
As for stability, it's generally considered that Windows Server 2003 and XP x64 are FAR more stable than Vista, so again, they're really uneducated :P

UncertainGod Wrote:They should just finish the original codebase of longhorn, it had the potential, speed and all round awesomeness (well, except for the sidebar, I fudgeing hate that). Only problem is that the original main longhorn team, with the exception of one or two devlopers all work for Google now.
Lol.
Though I didn't know what happened to the codebase.  But the sidebar can be ripped out anyway :P
Early alpha releases of Longhorn, well, according to reviews didn't seem to be that great.  Never tried myself though, so I dunno.
18/09/2007 08:39 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Vegetano1
$urf

Posts: 9,083.2507
Threads: 397
Joined: 2nd Mar 2007
Reputation: 6.06988
E-Pigs: 2756.6280
Offline
Post: #18
RE: As you probably know,  Vista isn't so successful
So i read the whole topic,.. i want to know "is 64bit vista faster then 32bit xp!?"
And if i am correct 64bit xp would be faster then 64bit vista,.!?
i am planning to install 64bit because i have had a beta 64bit xp and that was woot woot fast!!


Make loads of $$!! it wurks!!
[Image: csbanner_anim_03.gif]
Signed Homebrew by bsanehi & OMightyBuggy
http://endlessparadigm.com/forum/showthr...?tid=25707
Spoiler for My miniBlog:
19/09/2007 06:33 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UncertainGod
Illogical mindfuckery

Posts: 1,492.4476
Threads: 88
Joined: 16th Aug 2007
Reputation: -8.70083
E-Pigs: 7.1412
Offline
Post: #19
RE: As you probably know,  Vista isn't so successful
V1, all versions of Vista be slower than any other version of Windows. There be's no 'fast' version of Vista, for the modern hardware the speediest version of windows is XP Pro x64. arr.
(This post was last modified: 19/09/2007 06:46 AM by UncertainGod.)
19/09/2007 06:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
u_c_taker
hacks=drama

Posts: 3,185.2011
Threads: 102
Joined: 29th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.03084
E-Pigs: 36.7855
Offline
Post: #20
RE: As you probably know,  Vista isn't so successful
well vista seems to manage memory very badly

19/09/2007 10:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme: