V1's Badaboom Review/Contest
|
Author |
Message |
Vegetano1
$urf
Posts: 9,083.2507 Threads: 397
Joined: 2nd Mar 2007
Reputation: 6.06988
E-Pigs: 2756.6280
|
RE: V1's Badaboom Review/Contest
BADABOOM most likely not 20x faster then x264 but BADABOOM is def not slower,.. ;p
I only use BADABOOM for my PSP transcoding's as of now,. its fast and quality is superA!! also with eg xvid4psp i was't able to make video wich could be set to "normal, full screen and zoom" on my psp,.
If a batch mode is added that would be great! 
Also would be nice to have some pop-ups to explain some settings in advanced mode.
have't run any test yet BADABOOM VS Xvid4PSP but i guess its would be useless,.. cause they prob score almost the same.
|
|
17/03/2009 07:16 AM |
|
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,024.1882 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1887
|
RE: V1's Badaboom Review/Contest
Measuring quality is silly. Most things, just stick the bitrate up high, and the quality will be good. The thing to compare for is efficiency, ie quality/size ratio.
Not slower? I wouldn't make that statement so soon - not everyone has a GTX295 graphics card.
|
|
17/03/2009 07:40 PM |
|
Assassinator
...
Posts: 6,646.6190 Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
|
RE: V1's Badaboom Review/Contest
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:Measuring quality is silly. Most things, just stick the bitrate up high, and the quality will be good. The thing to compare for is efficiency, ie quality/size ratio.
<Dark_Shikari> ugh, you saw the guy in the big buck bunny thread?
<Dark_Shikari> he justified his bitrate of 15 megabits (WAY above transparency) by saying he wanted "the true hi-def experience"
<Dark_Shikari> the marketing seems to be working
<pengvado> you're just missing the definition of "the true hi-def experience". it really means "requiring a bigger hdd"
(This post was last modified: 17/03/2009 08:02 PM by Assassinator.)
|
|
17/03/2009 07:56 PM |
|
Mickey
Down with MJ yo
Posts: 3,663.2843 Threads: 251
Joined: 26th Apr 2008
E-Pigs: 28.7300
|
RE: V1's Badaboom Review/Contest
Assassinator Wrote:ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:Measuring quality is silly. Most things, just stick the bitrate up high, and the quality will be good. The thing to compare for is efficiency, ie quality/size ratio.
<Dark_Shikari> ugh, you saw the guy in the big buck bunny thread?
<Dark_Shikari> he justified his bitrate of 15 megabits (WAY above transparency) by saying he wanted "the true hi-def experience"
<Dark_Shikari> the marketing seems to be working
<pengvado> you're just missing the definition of "the true hi-def experience". it really means "requiring a bigger hdd"
Lol i read something just like that at an irc conversation :p
|
|
17/03/2009 08:11 PM |
|
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,024.1882 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1887
|
RE: V1's Badaboom Review/Contest
Lol. Of course, it also depends on the content... Video game footage seems to be one of the hardest things to compress. Visualisation dumps (ie the visualiser that shows when playing music) is perhaps the worst thing to try to compress.
|
|
17/03/2009 08:19 PM |
|
Vegetano1
$urf
Posts: 9,083.2507 Threads: 397
Joined: 2nd Mar 2007
Reputation: 6.06988
E-Pigs: 2756.6280
|
RE: V1's Badaboom Review/Contest
on topic,. ...
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:Measuring quality is silly. Most things, just stick the bitrate up high, and the quality will be good. The thing to compare for is efficiency, ie quality/size ratio.
Not slower? I wouldn't make that statement so soon - not everyone has a GTX295 graphics card.
Was't the 295gtx a dual gpu sli 200 card,. and is't badaboom not using sli and only 1 gpu for trancoding,.!>? i guess the new "cheap!!" geforce 250 might even trancode faster then my gtx295,...
For a video noob like me,. i get "good quality/fast/easy" video for my PSP,. ;p
To make a nice compare between GPU & CPU transcoding/encoding,.
prices
encode settings >> source file & output file,..
?????
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:Lol. Of course, it also depends on the content... Video game footage seems to be one of the hardest things to compress. Visualisation dumps (ie the visualiser that shows when playing music) is perhaps the worst thing to try to compress.
Why would a program compress visualiser?
Quote:<Dark_Shikari> the marketing seems to be working
...
(This post was last modified: 18/03/2009 02:55 AM by Vegetano1.)
|
|
18/03/2009 02:50 AM |
|
Assassinator
...
Posts: 6,646.6190 Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
|
RE: V1's Badaboom Review/Contest
Vegetano1 Wrote:Was't the 295gtx a dual gpu sli 200 card,. and is't badaboom not using sli and only 1 gpu for trancoding,.!>? i guess the new "cheap!!" geforce 250 might even trancode faster then my gtx295,...
295GTX is two 260GTX stuck together in internal SLI. So yeah, if you buy a 260GTX, you would get the same speed.
Vegetano1 Wrote:Assassinator Wrote:<Dark_Shikari> the marketing seems to be working
...
He was referring to marketing about HD stuff.
|
|
18/03/2009 04:44 AM |
|
Vegetano1
$urf
Posts: 9,083.2507 Threads: 397
Joined: 2nd Mar 2007
Reputation: 6.06988
E-Pigs: 2756.6280
|
RE: V1's Badaboom Review/Contest
I did s small conversion test:
but badaboom is aout the race because it srewed the conversion by repeating the first frame through the whole movie,. maybe because this was a .mkv file,. .>!? but still badaboom is 2 minutes faster.
I do some more test,. just for phun later!
Xvid4psp:
Quote:PLATFORM
------------------------------
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7057.0
OEMCodePage: 437
Language: ENU
DecimalSeparator: .
Framework: 2.0.50727.4908
Processors: 8 i7
Machine: USER-PC
UserName: Maya
SystemDrive: C:
XVID4PSP
------------------------------
Version: 5.036
Created: 10/18/2008 6:36:32 PM
TempPath: C:\Temp
AppPath: C:\Program Files\Winnydows\XviD4PSP5
FILES
------------------------------
Resident.Evil.Degeneration.LiMiTED.1080p.mkv >
Resident.Evil.Degeneration.LiMiTED.1080p.mp4
TASK
------------------------------
Format: MP4 PSP AVC
Duration: 01:36:05:766 (138240)
VideoDecoder: DirectShowSource
Resolution: 1920x1080 > 480x272
VCodecPreset: x264 HQ Ultra
VEncodingMode: Quality
VideoCodec: h264 > x264
VideoBitrate: 5346 > Q21.0
Framerate: 23.976
SourceType: PROGRESSIVE
FieldOrder: UNKNOWN
AudioDecoder: NicAC3Source
AEncodingPreset: AAC-LC ABR 128k
AudioCodec: AC3 > AAC
AudioBitrate: 448 > 128
Samplerate: 48000
Channels: 6 > 2
UpDownMix: ConvertToDolbyProLogicII
Normalize: 100%
Accurate: 3%
Gain: 4.077
VIDEO ENCODING
------------------------------
Encoding video to: C:\Temp\0001.264
x264 Q21.0 480x272 23.976fps (138240 frames)
x264 [info]: profile Main, level 3.0
AUDIO ENCODING
------------------------------
Encoding audio to: C:\Temp\0001.m4a
AAC 128kbps 2ch 16bit 48000khz
MUXING
------------------------------
Video file: C:\Temp\0001.264
Audio file: C:\Temp\0001.m4a
Muxing to: C:\Users\USER\Desktop\Resident.Evil.Degeneration.LiMiTED.1080p.mp4
TIME
------------------------------
Total encoding time: 45 min 29 sec
Out file size is: 398.79 mb
Badaboom:
![[Image: xdtlrb.png]](http://i44.tinypic.com/xdtlrb.png)
(This post was last modified: 19/03/2009 02:38 AM by Vegetano1.)
|
|
19/03/2009 02:37 AM |
|
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,024.1882 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1887
|
RE: V1's Badaboom Review/Contest
Try the Turbo profile instead of the Ultra one in XviD4PSP.
|
|
19/03/2009 02:48 AM |
|
roberth
Resident Full Stop Abuser.....
Posts: 4,580.2098 Threads: 200
Joined: 18th Jun 2007
Reputation: -5.5814
E-Pigs: 43.8419
|
RE: V1's Badaboom Review/Contest
Thoughts from someone with slightly more average components
Its certainly faster than Xvid4PSP, although the quality options are far from expansive
Considering i paid £90 for my GPU already, i consider it unfair to have to pay for the application, (although for its speed, and a certainly acceptable quality, i intend to come Thursday)
My other complaint is that although i have realalternative installed, it won't recognise RMVB files. Xvid4PSP seems to be picky with them, and sometimes fails, but it does work
|
|
20/03/2009 07:52 PM |
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)