Endless Paradigm

the day after tomorrow, if i can get all the papers tomorrow.
lol. now to work out a route to airport.

Why go back now that the disaster is already over?

I mean it's safe now.  Unless you're worried about the nuclear reactor blowing up.

woa that was one hell of an earthquake and I'm so glad you're Ok Heartless but you know that some cities have been entirely washed away and as heartless as you are it wouldn't be bad to show at least a bit of feeling well not to say I would have felt any different than you if I was there too.
Running out the building would work, but not in japan when your living in a 100 floor building on for example the 70 floor and also buildings in japan have been so well made to take earthquakes and surely if this earthquake hadn't caused a tsunami there surely wouldn't have been much damage at all.
I've even watched the videos on the news and the only thing the Japanese, in there buildings, in places that weren't in the strike of the tsunami were concerned about seemed to be their computers and the were just holding their computers and the building were amazing they seemed like they were like a snake, so flexible and nothing happened to them with a 8.9 earthquake.
I don't know if you guys had heard about that disastrous earthquake here in Iran I think about 2 years ago, it was only about 6.6 I think and it wiped the entire city with 70,000 people dead but up till now in japan there has only been I think about 14,000 people killed and that is with a 8.9 earthquake

bloodangel619 Wrote: [ -> ]9.8 earthquake

it was 8.9, then re-evaluated at 9

don't know where you got 9.8 from

are you actually going home heartless?

ProperBritish Wrote: [ -> ]

bloodangel619 Wrote: [ -> ]9.8 earthquake

it was 8.9, then re-evaluated at 9

don't know where you got 9.8 from

are you actually going home heartless?

:dotdotdot:yeah sorry 8.9 fixed that

just watched a video of Kesennuma tsunami hit, the water gets as deep as a house and pulls cars, trucks and houses away.

ProperBritish Wrote: [ -> ]just watched a video of Kesennuma tsunami hit, the water gets as deep as a house and pulls cars, trucks and houses away.

more and more vids are showing now,.. its terrible,. whole cities turned into scrap piles,.

nothing there anymore,. houses all gone,..

good the large skyscrapers can stand earth quake's like this,.. bad they had build neclear reactors on that site of the island,.. O_o

i have seen reports of earth-quake 8.7, 8.8 and 9.1,.. also the force released by the shifting plates is like 1000x a nuclear bomb,. O_o

there is a possibility of more earth quake's,. i had still believe its because of the moon being this close to earth,. 18 march he will be closest,..

bloodangel619...

Ok.  Fuck.  You need to get your facts straight.  And also, lrn2fullstop.

bloodangel619 Wrote: [ -> ]and also buildings in japan have been so well made to take earthquakes and surely if this earthquake hadn't caused a tsunami there surely wouldn't have been much damage at all. and the building were amazing they seemed like they were like a snake, so flexible and nothing happened to them with a 9.8 earthquake.

[1]. 8.9 earthquake, not 9.8.

A 9.8 earthquake is like almost 10x stronger in terms of shaking and like 32x stronger in terms of energy released than a 8.9 earthquake.  A 9.8 scale earthquake has never been recorded.  Supposedly with a scale 10 earthquake, you would be able to see huge waves ripple across the ground, nothing will survive that.

[2]. The earthquake happened in the ocean, thus the tsunami.  Also it was somewhat far away so the shaking on the land wasn't too bad.  Almost all the damage came from the tsunami, not from shaking.

[3]. If the earthquake happened closer on the land instead, trust me the buildings will fall.  So they are probably fortune that the earthquake happened far away in the ocean instead of on the land.

bloodangel619 Wrote: [ -> ]Running out the building would work, but not in japan when your living in a 100 floor building on for example the 70 floor

Not fucking everyone lives in a 100 floor building.  Most people don't.

Seriously, do you get this kind of shit from watching anime or something?

bloodangel619 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't know if you guys had heard about that disastrous earthquake here in Iran I think about 2 years ago, it was only about 6.6 I think and it wiped the entire city with 70,000 people dead but up till now in japan there has only been I think about 14,000 people killed and that is with a 9.8 earthquake

Because an earthquake far-ish away from the city is obviously going to be just devastating as an earth quake right next to the city.

You also need to consider the distance to the epicenter, not just the scale.

people, at most, live in 10 floor buildings, though i'd say the average is more like 4 or 5. For blocks of flats, that is. There actual houses in Japan as well :P

Assassinator Wrote: [ -> ]bloodangel619...

Ok.  Fuck.  You need to get your facts straight.  And also, lrn2fullstop.

I've already admitted that my English writing sucks and I use a lot of "and"s with no full stops (though this also is because I'm too lazy)

Assassinator Wrote: [ -> ]

bloodangel619 Wrote: [ -> ]and also buildings in japan have been so well made to take earthquakes and surely if this earthquake hadn't caused a tsunami there surely wouldn't have been much damage at all. and the building were amazing they seemed like they were like a snake, so flexible and nothing happened to them with a 9.8 earthquake.

[1]. 8.9 earthquake, not 9.8.

A 9.8 earthquake is like almost 10x stronger in terms of shaking and like 32x stronger in terms of energy released than a 8.9 earthquake.  A 9.8 scale earthquake has never been recorded.  Supposedly with a scale 10 earthquake, you would be able to see huge waves ripple across the ground, nothing will survive that.

[2]. The earthquake happened in the ocean, thus the tsunami.  Also it was somewhat far away so the shaking on the land wasn't too bad.  Almost all the damage came from the tsunami, not from shaking.

[3]. If the earthquake happened closer on the land instead, trust me the buildings will fall.  So they are probably fortune that the earthquake happened far away in the ocean instead of on the land.

[1] that was a misspell I've already admited and changed it.
[2]that was what I said, in ways.
[3] japan has gone through earthquakes like this, maybe not as terrible as this one but still close and the devastation hasn't been so huge. I still think that an earthquake like this in the middle of the city would have caused less devastation.

bloodangel619 Wrote: [ -> ]Running out the building would work, but not in japan when your living in a 100 floor building on for example the 70 floor

Assassinator Wrote: [ -> ]Not fucking everyone lives in a 100 floor building.  Most people don't.

Seriously, do you get this kind of shit from watching anime or something?

I didn't say all buildings in japan are 100 floors. I was just giving an example and I just meant to say that you can't always run out of the building

and what's the difference any way, could you jump down a 4 or 5 floor building

bloodangel619 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't know if you guys had heard about that disastrous earthquake here in Iran I think about 2 years ago, it was only about 6.6 I think and it wiped the entire city with 70,000 people dead but up till now in japan there has only been I think about 14,000 people killed and that is with a 9.8 earthquake

Assassinator Wrote: [ -> ]Because an earthquake far-ish away from the city is obviously going to be just devastating as an earth quake right next to the city.

You also need to consider the distance to the epicenter, not just the scale.

I don't think that was the problem, look at this picture and compare the buildings with japan. I can't seem to find any better pictures but I'm sure it clearly shows the difference and how weak the buildings were.