Endless Paradigm / Computers & Tech / Crazy Computer / [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard

Post Reply 
[Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
Author Message
Kuu
Awesome

Posts: 971.1304
Threads: 50
Joined: 13th Aug 2008
Reputation: -2.97985
E-Pigs: 28.3679
Offline
Post: #281
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard

Code:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
 
x264 HD BENCHMARK 3.0 RESULTS 
 
Please do not compare it with older versions of the benchmark! 
Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data 
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
 
Results for x264.exe r1342 
-------------------------- 
encoded 1442 frames, 130.43 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 130.39 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 130.14 fps, 3901.21 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 129.42 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 41.34 fps, 3970.47 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 41.39 fps, 3971.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 41.50 fps, 3971.32 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 41.40 fps, 3971.61 kb/s
 
 
System Details 
-------------- 
	Name			Intel Processor
	product			System Product Name
	Codename		
	Specification		Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz
	Core Stepping		
	Core Speed		3503.5 MHz
 
Northbridge			Intel ID0150 rev. 09
Southbridge			Intel ID1E44 rev. 04
 
Memory Type			
Memory Size			16260 MBytes
 
Windows Version			Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Ultimate Edition  Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) 
 
Number of processors		1
Number of threads		4
	Number of threads	4 (max 16)
	L2 cache		4 x 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
	Instructions sets	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, VT-x, AES, AVX
	Package 		
 
	Temperature 0	37°C (98°F) [0x25] (SYSTIN)
	Temperature 1	48°C (117°F) [0x5F] (CPUTIN)
	Temperature 0	28°C (82°F) [0xBC2] (TZ00)
	Temperature 1	30°C (85°F) [0xBD6] (TZ01)



CPU peaked at 56*C.

And with updated x264.exe:

Code:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
 
x264 HD BENCHMARK 3.0 RESULTS 
 
Please do not compare it with older versions of the benchmark! 
Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data 
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
 
Results for x264.exe 
-------------------------- 
encoded 1442 frames, 196.38 fps, 3911.69 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 195.37 fps, 3911.69 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 170.01 fps, 3911.69 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 194.03 fps, 3911.69 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 43.66 fps, 3970.20 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 42.77 fps, 3969.47 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 42.68 fps, 3969.65 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 43.32 fps, 3969.54 kb/s
 
 
System Details 
-------------- 
	Name			Intel Processor
	product			System Product Name
	Codename		
	Specification		Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz
	Core Stepping		
	Core Speed		3502.6 MHz
 
Northbridge			Intel ID0150 rev. 09
Southbridge			Intel ID1E44 rev. 04
 
Memory Type			
Memory Size			16260 MBytes
 
Windows Version			Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Ultimate Edition  Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) 
 
Number of processors		1
Number of threads		4
	Number of threads	4 (max 16)
	L2 cache		4 x 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
	Instructions sets	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, VT-x, AES, AVX
	Package 		
 
	Temperature 0	37°C (98°F) [0x25] (SYSTIN)
	Temperature 1	47°C (115°F) [0x5D] (CPUTIN)
	Temperature 0	28°C (82°F) [0xBC2] (TZ00)
	Temperature 1	30°C (85°F) [0xBD6] (TZ01)

[Image: B5b0K][Image: FSN6.png]
(This post was last modified: 25/06/2012 01:57 AM by Kuu.)
25/06/2012 01:37 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Assassinator
...

Posts: 6,744.2815
Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 138.6963
Offline
Post: #282
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
(25/06/2012 01:37 AM)Kuu Wrote:  

Code:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
 
x264 HD BENCHMARK 3.0 RESULTS 
 
Please do not compare it with older versions of the benchmark! 
Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data 
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
 
Results for x264.exe r1342 
-------------------------- 
encoded 1442 frames, 130.43 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 130.39 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 130.14 fps, 3901.21 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 129.42 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 41.34 fps, 3970.47 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 41.39 fps, 3971.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 41.50 fps, 3971.32 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 41.40 fps, 3971.61 kb/s
 
 
System Details 
-------------- 
	Name			Intel Processor
	product			System Product Name
	Codename		
	Specification		Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz
	Core Stepping		
	Core Speed		3503.5 MHz
 
Northbridge			Intel ID0150 rev. 09
Southbridge			Intel ID1E44 rev. 04
 
Memory Type			
Memory Size			16260 MBytes
 
Windows Version			Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Ultimate Edition  Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) 
 
Number of processors		1
Number of threads		4
	Number of threads	4 (max 16)
	L2 cache		4 x 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size
	Instructions sets	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, VT-x, AES, AVX
	Package 		
 
	Temperature 0	37°C (98°F) [0x25] (SYSTIN)
	Temperature 1	48°C (117°F) [0x5F] (CPUTIN)
	Temperature 0	28°C (82°F) [0xBC2] (TZ00)
	Temperature 1	30°C (85°F) [0xBD6] (TZ01)


Did you overclock your thing or do anything else?

How come Zinga with the same CPU got vastly inferior results...
(This post was last modified: 25/06/2012 06:28 AM by Assassinator.)
25/06/2012 06:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kuu
Awesome

Posts: 971.1304
Threads: 50
Joined: 13th Aug 2008
Reputation: -2.97985
E-Pigs: 28.3679
Offline
Post: #283
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
(25/06/2012 06:28 AM)Assassinator Wrote:  Did you overclock your thing or do anything else?

How come Zinga with the same CPU got vastly inferior results...

+1 GHz

[Image: 6ISE1.jpg]


[Image: 0ehD1.png]
[Image: B5b0K][Image: FSN6.png]
(This post was last modified: 25/06/2012 12:35 PM by Kuu.)
25/06/2012 11:53 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative

Posts: 16,796.2901
Threads: 1,130
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.13303
E-Pigs: 429.2836
Offline
Post: #284
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
Out of interest, what VCore you running at for the 4.8GHz clock?

At 4GHz, or 4.3GHz for one core active:

Code:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
 
Results for x264.exe r1342 
-------------------------- 
encoded 1442 frames, 116.18 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 117.80 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 117.29 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 115.90 fps, 3901.21 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 36.31 fps, 3971.67 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 36.20 fps, 3971.60 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 36.26 fps, 3971.96 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 36.43 fps, 3971.86 kb/s


Seems about right.

(This post was last modified: 25/06/2012 04:23 PM by ZiNgA BuRgA.)
25/06/2012 04:19 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kuu
Awesome

Posts: 971.1304
Threads: 50
Joined: 13th Aug 2008
Reputation: -2.97985
E-Pigs: 28.3679
Offline
Post: #285
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
(25/06/2012 04:19 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:  Out of interest, what VCore you running at for the 4.8GHz clock?

1.135v I believe. I'm still playing with it though.
[Image: B5b0K][Image: FSN6.png]
25/06/2012 07:30 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative

Posts: 16,796.2901
Threads: 1,130
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.13303
E-Pigs: 429.2836
Offline
Post: #286
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
You must've got pretty good die then, cause that seems to be quite good.
27/06/2012 02:41 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
squee666
Grand Warlock

Posts: 3,557.4807
Threads: 349
Joined: 4th May 2007
Reputation: 12.17831
E-Pigs: 554.1089
Offline
Post: #287
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
Using Old version on my laptop

Code:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
 
x264 HD BENCHMARK 3.0 RESULTS 
 
Results for x264.exe r1342 
-------------------------- 
encoded 1442 frames, 41.41 fps, 3899.26 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 41.40 fps, 3899.26 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 42.07 fps, 3899.26 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 40.70 fps, 3899.26 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 11.06 fps, 3971.20 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 11.03 fps, 3971.52 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 11.05 fps, 3970.75 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 11.06 fps, 3972.21 kb/s

[Image: sotw52.png]
Spoiler for anime watched:
[Image: squee666.jpg]
16/07/2012 11:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kuu
Awesome

Posts: 971.1304
Threads: 50
Joined: 13th Aug 2008
Reputation: -2.97985
E-Pigs: 28.3679
Offline
Post: #288
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
(27/06/2012 02:41 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:  You must've got pretty good die then, cause that seems to be quite good.

Haha I meant 1.35v, not 1.135. Final over clock was 4.7 Ghz at 1.30v. I could get to 4.9 without crashing but it was unstable under prolonged load. RAM went from 1333MHz to 1600MHz (1599) after OC.
[Image: B5b0K][Image: FSN6.png]
17/07/2012 05:27 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative

Posts: 16,796.2901
Threads: 1,130
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.13303
E-Pigs: 429.2836
Offline
Post: #289
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
(17/07/2012 05:27 AM)Kuu Wrote:  
(27/06/2012 02:41 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:  You must've got pretty good die then, cause that seems to be quite good.

Haha I meant 1.35v, not 1.135. Final over clock was 4.7 Ghz at 1.30v. I could get to 4.9 without crashing but it was unstable under prolonged load. RAM went from 1333MHz to 1600MHz (1599) after OC.
That makes more sense.  Most people seem to need ≥1.2V for 4.5GHz clocks on that chip.  Apparently ≥1.3V isn't good for the chip, so I'd probably drop it a bit further.
If you're just adjusting the multiplier, I suspect RAM speed shouldn't change?  That sounds really weird.
17/07/2012 02:50 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kuu
Awesome

Posts: 971.1304
Threads: 50
Joined: 13th Aug 2008
Reputation: -2.97985
E-Pigs: 28.3679
Offline
Post: #290
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
I OC'd the RAM myself.
[Image: B5b0K][Image: FSN6.png]
17/07/2012 03:58 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme:


Privacy Policy | Endless Paradigm | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication