Post Reply 
Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
Author Message
diego
poof

Posts: 7,826.1659
Threads: 264
Joined: 22nd Jun 2007
Reputation: 1.80067
E-Pigs: 37.4012
Offline
Post: #21
RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
(22/07/2010 10:09 PM)Mickey Wrote:  Why not allow videos to be longer than 10 minutes rather than this retareded spoon :/

Agreed.

[Image: cce6aa9e-c40c-4ae7-aebe-d7780d6fc009.gif]
22/07/2010 10:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
S7*
Sweet Dreams

Posts: 16,689.4373
Threads: 1,056
Joined: 3rd Apr 2007
Reputation: 14.29926
E-Pigs: 383.2289
Offline
Post: #22
RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
(22/07/2010 09:17 PM)Assassinator Wrote:  
  • Ticking the GPU Acceleration box in VLC made my whole goddamn computer blue screen.  Most likely VLC's fault though.[/list]

  • LOL. VLC sucks hard.

    (22/07/2010 10:09 PM)Mickey Wrote:  Why not allow videos to be longer than 10 minutes rather than this retareded spoon :/

    I'm pretty sure you can upload more than 10 minutes if you have a Director/Producer account.. which makes sense.

    Ah, you can only upload vids longer than 10 minutes if you're a partner >> http://www.youtube.com/partners

    That's it. YouTube sucks hard too. (Last night I was ragequitting all youtube videos because they didn't fudgeing buffer properly - the higher the definition the better the buffer. Retarded, I know)
    23/07/2010 01:16 AM
    Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    Assassinator
    ...

    Posts: 6,646.6190
    Threads: 176
    Joined: 24th Apr 2007
    Reputation: 8.53695
    E-Pigs: 140.8363
    Offline
    Post: #23
    RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
    (23/07/2010 01:16 AM)S7* Wrote:  LOL. VLC sucks hard.

    At least they fixed their H.264 demuxer lately.  That was like one of my biggest issues with VLC.  You seek, and the whole screen screws up into little multicolored blocks.

    But yeah, always liked MPC better, more reliable, less buggy.  VLC portable is good for taking to school and other places though (otherwise you're stuck with the default XP WMP install, and next to no codecs).
    23/07/2010 01:24 AM
    Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    ZiNgA BuRgA
    Smart Alternative

    Posts: 17,023.4213
    Threads: 1,174
    Joined: 19th Jan 2007
    Reputation: -1.71391
    E-Pigs: 446.0333
    Offline
    Post: #24
    RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
    (22/07/2010 09:17 PM)Assassinator Wrote:  For some unknown reason, this was actually surprisingly easy to play back.  Only used like 35-50% of CPU usage on my quad, which means any decent dual core should also be able to do it.
    Some guy said that it wouldn't run smoothly on his C2D E6600 CPU.  Possibly decoder, but just giving a general idea on the information I'm basing off.

    (22/07/2010 10:09 PM)Mickey Wrote:  Why not allow videos to be longer than 10 minutes rather than this retareded spoon :/
    I think there's like a maximum length if you don't want to pay certain licensing fees.  For H.264, it's cut at around 10 minutes.

    Not like Google was short on cash though - in fact, it would probably be a better use of money than wasting it on computing resources to encode 4k resolutions...
    23/07/2010 01:54 AM
    Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    Assassinator
    ...

    Posts: 6,646.6190
    Threads: 176
    Joined: 24th Apr 2007
    Reputation: 8.53695
    E-Pigs: 140.8363
    Offline
    Post: #25
    RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
    (23/07/2010 01:54 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:  
    (22/07/2010 09:17 PM)Assassinator Wrote:  For some unknown reason, this was actually surprisingly easy to play back.  Only used like 35-50% of CPU usage on my quad, which means any decent dual core should also be able to do it.
    Some guy said that it wouldn't run smoothly on his C2D E6600 CPU.  Possibly decoder, but just giving a general idea on the information I'm basing off.

    Well, E6600 is pretty weak, it's a first generation C2D running @2.4GHz.  That won't even me equal to 1/2 my processor.

    I'm using ffmpeg-mt, which is most likely quite a bit better than Flash, especially when there's recent been a significant amount of speed optimizations for it (or so heard).
    23/07/2010 02:33 AM
    Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    ZiNgA BuRgA
    Smart Alternative

    Posts: 17,023.4213
    Threads: 1,174
    Joined: 19th Jan 2007
    Reputation: -1.71391
    E-Pigs: 446.0333
    Offline
    Post: #26
    RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
    (23/07/2010 02:33 AM)Assassinator Wrote:  
    (23/07/2010 01:54 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:  
    (22/07/2010 09:17 PM)Assassinator Wrote:  For some unknown reason, this was actually surprisingly easy to play back.  Only used like 35-50% of CPU usage on my quad, which means any decent dual core should also be able to do it.
    Some guy said that it wouldn't run smoothly on his C2D E6600 CPU.  Possibly decoder, but just giving a general idea on the information I'm basing off.

    Well, E6600 is pretty weak, it's a first generation C2D running @2.4GHz.  That won't even me equal to 1/2 my processor.
    It's pretty much half of a Q6600.  From your CPU usage, it's not exceeding 50%, so probably not using more than 2 cores anyway.
    23/07/2010 02:40 AM
    Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    Slushba132
    BustyLoli-Chan

    Posts: 3,125.3993
    Threads: 508
    Joined: 20th Feb 2008
    Reputation: -8.27558
    E-Pigs: 73.1299
    Offline
    Post: #27
    RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
    Why: because wee can...
    probably not very effective but if it's possible why not XD

    As far as flash handling multiple cores...
    http://Slushnet.dyndns.org

    TheS is a 120 fps flash application that uses mathematics to render 3D points into a 2d image.
    I've noticed the different speeds on different machines I have tested it on... so one must assume that available cpu and ram affect flash, rendering speed and the like.

    I have never tried encoding anything though

    (This post was last modified: 23/07/2010 03:20 AM by Slushba132.)
    23/07/2010 03:20 AM
    Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    S7*
    Sweet Dreams

    Posts: 16,689.4373
    Threads: 1,056
    Joined: 3rd Apr 2007
    Reputation: 14.29926
    E-Pigs: 383.2289
    Offline
    Post: #28
    RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
    (23/07/2010 01:24 AM)Assassinator Wrote:  But yeah, always liked MPC better, more reliable, less buggy.  VLC portable is good for taking to school and other places though (otherwise you're stuck with the default XP WMP install, and next to no codecs).

    You can make MPC-HC rather portable. You probably know the latest builds only seem to be available at http://x264.nl , get that one.

    Run it, in Player, Other tick "Store settings to INI file".

    Remove any External Filters, in Internal Filters tick all available.

    Close the player, open the .INI, in it, paste without quotes "RememberPlaylistItems=0", save it.

    Delete the third file that MPC-HC produces as a result of RememberPlaylistItems, it won't be created again.

    Throw the exe and ini onto your drive.

    I've only briefly played around with it. Its internal codecs are based on FFmpeg (same as VLC?) and I haven't tried it with MKVs.

    Oh, the only flaw is that it apparently still leaves an entry in the Registry but nothing important.
    (This post was last modified: 23/07/2010 05:41 AM by S7*.)
    23/07/2010 05:35 AM
    Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    ZiNgA BuRgA
    Smart Alternative

    Posts: 17,023.4213
    Threads: 1,174
    Joined: 19th Jan 2007
    Reputation: -1.71391
    E-Pigs: 446.0333
    Offline
    Post: #29
    RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
    (23/07/2010 05:35 AM)S7* Wrote:  You can make MPC-HC rather portable. You probably know the latest builds only seem to be available at http://x264.nl , get that one.
    Actually, latest (SVN) builds, get them from here: http://www.xvidvideo.ru/media-player-cla...ma-x86-x64 (Russian + English site, don't get freaked out by the former)
    SourceForge build is r1249.
    (This post was last modified: 23/07/2010 05:53 AM by ZiNgA BuRgA.)
    23/07/2010 05:52 AM
    Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    S7*
    Sweet Dreams

    Posts: 16,689.4373
    Threads: 1,056
    Joined: 3rd Apr 2007
    Reputation: 14.29926
    E-Pigs: 383.2289
    Offline
    Post: #30
    RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
    (23/07/2010 05:52 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:  
    (23/07/2010 05:35 AM)S7* Wrote:  You can make MPC-HC rather portable. You probably know the latest builds only seem to be available at http://x264.nl , get that one.
    Actually, latest (SVN) builds, get them from here: http://www.xvidvideo.ru/media-player-cla...ma-x86-x64 (Russian + English site, don't get freaked out by the former)
    SourceForge build is r1249.

    the one on x264 is 1301. Custom build?
    23/07/2010 05:56 AM
    Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    Post Reply 


    Forum Jump:


    User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

     Quick Theme: