Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Vegetano1 · 22/07/2010 06:00 AM

I am not much of a youtuber,. but is't it posible to download clips? if so,. you can skip streaming,. but still very useless such high res,. O_o

ProperBritish · 22/07/2010 06:09 AM

theve done it because they can

and knows noone will be able to test its actual functionality

Sparker · 22/07/2010 06:14 AM

(22/07/2010 06:00 AM)Vegetano1 Wrote: I am not much of a youtuber,. but is't it posible to download clips? if so,. you can skip streaming,. but still very useless such high res,. O_o

You can, but not from Youtube it's self.

SchmilK · 22/07/2010 06:18 AM

for your information...my SchiDeLoaDeR theme from march 8 2008 used the Red camera for the video icon :P Just another show of how far advanced my themes were LOLOLOL

[Image: snap060ht7.jpg]

*edit* i miss my old Compaq tube monitor..22" that did 2560x2048 :( Computer games looked so good at that resolution using SLI...until the tube started to die and I could barely see the picture anymore :-/

eKusoshisut0 · 22/07/2010 07:44 AM

Doesn't really concern me since I can't view 720p videos without it freezing or just slowing down considerably >_>

Hellgiver · 22/07/2010 03:12 PM

... I wonder how the decision came about? What is the actual reasoning for it? To be a forerunner in the field of upper high-definition user-uploaded (I'd assume...) videos? I have still not even seen a 2560x1600 video IRL, and that has been around for years. I... can't see this resolution being even remotely in high demand for a number of years. I still see plenty of people just now getting their first 1920x1080 monitors (still makes me cringe to hear 16:9 "monitors").

At this time? For next few years? Useless. Still... I'd have liked to hear their thought processes.

krystabegnalie · 22/07/2010 06:11 PM

720p videos still lags in my laptop, since it has lowres screen, still i still downsize vids that ive ripped from youtube, lol

Assassinator · 22/07/2010 09:17 PM

(22/07/2010 04:52 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:

Many CPUs can't decode it without lag (especially going to slow Flash); I suspect it will choke all but the best Core 2's, but I can't seem to find reliable results

DXVA (GPU decoding) probably chokes on it too.

Ok, finally managed to get back onto my desktop.

GPU decoding:

MPC-HC won't use DXVA on that video. So probably not supported.
Ticking the GPU Acceleration box in VLC made my whole goddamn computer blue screen. Most likely VLC's fault though.

CPU decoding:

For some unknown reason, this was actually surprisingly easy to play back. Only used like 35-50% of CPU usage on my quad, which means any decent dual core should also be able to do it.
Compare to some of the 1080p BDrips that I have lying around, which take about 15-30% CPU to play (depending on complexity), this is extremely unexpected, since it has up to 4x as many pixels per frame.
The could be a combination of... 1). That video I had was probably on the easier-to-decode side (not much motion). 2). The (comparatively) low bitrate also helps decoding speed. 3). Maybe Google encoded it with settings that favours decoding speed (CAVLC, No in-loop deblocking)? Don't know, I do not have any stream analysis tools to check with.
CoreAVC is bugged, and refuses to play it. Actually, I'm just going to stop using CoreAVC as a whole. I hardly need the speed (my CPU is fast enough to play 3 1080p videos concurrently), and the bugs are not worth it (CoreAVC also has problems with windows thumbnail generation). Also, these days I use FFMS2 for like 90% of my encoding, and 9% of the rest is (dgdecode_)mpeg2source, so I don't CoreAVC any more for that either.

Mickey · 22/07/2010 10:09 PM

Why not allow videos to be longer than 10 minutes rather than this retareded spoon :/

Assassinator · 22/07/2010 10:40 PM

(22/07/2010 10:09 PM)Mickey Wrote: Why not allow videos to be longer than 10 minutes rather than this retareded spoon :/

Quoted for truth.

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
Author	Message