Post Reply 
Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
Author Message
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative

Posts: 17,023.4213
Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.0333
Offline
Post: #31
RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
(23/07/2010 05:56 AM)S7* Wrote:  
(23/07/2010 05:52 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:  
(23/07/2010 05:35 AM)S7* Wrote:  You can make MPC-HC rather portable. You probably know the latest builds only seem to be available at http://x264.nl , get that one.
Actually, latest (SVN) builds, get them from here: http://www.xvidvideo.ru/media-player-cla...ma-x86-x64 (Russian + English site, don't get freaked out by the former)
SourceForge build is r1249.

the one on x264 is 1301. Custom build?
Didn't realise they had a build on there (only saw the SourceForge link).  Silly me.
23/07/2010 06:14 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Assassinator
...

Posts: 6,646.6190
Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
Offline
Post: #32
RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
Personally, I'm using MPlayer (with the SMPlayer GUI) as my portable media player.  Using a special build of MPlayer that is patched to support ordered chapters.

But yeah, I guess it's worth a try making MPC-HC portable, as I like it's GUI the best.
23/07/2010 07:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dyehardzen
Neophitic Presence

Posts: 1.3331
Threads: 0
Joined: 6th Jun 2014
Reputation: 0
E-Pigs: 0.5480
Offline
Post: #33
RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
(22/07/2010 05:21 AM)Assassinator Wrote:  
(22/07/2010 04:52 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:  
  • Many CPUs can't decode it without lag (especially going to slow Flash); I suspect it will choke all but the best Core 2's, but I can't seem to find reliable results

  • I suspect it'll probably lag on all (not-overclocked) core2s besides the core2quads.



    Also, I confirmed that CoreAVC breaks on youtube 4k.  Others are having the same problem.

    I have a core 2 quad q9550 not overclocked or anything. Youtube 4k is just barely too much to run perfectly smooth. If I kill a few processes that are using it a little, then it's smooth. It's not my graphics card, its cpu.
    06/06/2014 11:14 PM
    Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    eKusoshisut0
    NOIDED

    Posts: 6,288.3965
    Threads: 102
    Joined: 6th Mar 2010
    Reputation: -0.51929
    E-Pigs: 174.7326
    Offline
    Post: #34
    RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
    6 years later.. 4k content not worth the extra time and work due to Youtube's bottlenecking (as far as resolution goes, you do get higher bitrate when selecting 4k)

    Source: YouTube

    [Image: tumblr_mlae69vAW21rmerh9o1_400.gif]


    More stuff
    Steam Page
    [Image: K7UVN.png]
    Thanks to Vacui_Natale for making this awesome siggy.
    [Image: cq8au.gif]
    Thanks to Natalie for this sexy Mawaru Penguindrum sig. <3
    [Image: ofusT.png][


        
    [Image: 9252_s.gif]

    (This post was last modified: 29/04/2016 09:33 PM by eKusoshisut0.)
    29/04/2016 09:28 PM
    Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    ZiNgA BuRgA
    Smart Alternative

    Posts: 17,023.4213
    Threads: 1,174
    Joined: 19th Jan 2007
    Reputation: -1.71391
    E-Pigs: 446.0333
    Offline
    Post: #35
    RE: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
    On the flip side:
    - Many Intel CPUs from the last ~5 years can decode 4K fine
    - Hardware 4K H.265 decoders exist these days, though I don't think Youtube uses H.265
    - Internet bandwidth is increasing, depending on where you live in the world, but probably not enough
    -» Google's next gen codecs (VP10) may help with this, but I doubt much (codecs get better compression ratio but increase computational costs; with CPUs not getting faster these days, there's somewhat a limit to how slow you can make a codec)

    Still mostly pointless IMO, but barriers to 4K are going down (which was pretty much expected).  I don't see 8K adoption any time soon, or even in a few years' time.

    Looking back 6 years... yeah, pretty much the bigger = better mentality.
    (This post was last modified: 12/05/2016 11:43 PM by ZiNgA BuRgA.)
    12/05/2016 11:39 PM
    Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
    Post Reply 


    Forum Jump:


    User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

     Quick Theme: