Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

eKusoshisut0 · 23/05/2010 09:27 PM

Nice pocketwatch...

Very nice Indeed 

xero1 · 23/05/2010 09:30 PM

I like it. I think anyway...

Can you take a picture of the face with no reflections?

Hellgiver · 23/05/2010 10:58 PM

I thought it was supposed to be IIII, not IV, on clocks?

http://www.ubr.com/clocks/frequently-ask...dials.aspx

edit: oh, and pretty watch ^^

1-R · 23/05/2010 11:10 PM

Very nice

Syfe · 23/05/2010 11:19 PM

(23/05/2010 10:58 PM)Hellgiver Wrote: I thought it was supposed to be IIII, not IV, on clocks?

http://www.ubr.com/clocks/frequently-ask...dials.aspx

edit: oh, and pretty watch ^^

it is supposed to be IV

Hellgiver · 23/05/2010 11:32 PM

(23/05/2010 11:19 PM)Syfe Wrote:
(23/05/2010 10:58 PM)Hellgiver Wrote: I thought it was supposed to be IIII, not IV, on clocks?

http://www.ubr.com/clocks/frequently-ask...dials.aspx

edit: oh, and pretty watch ^^

it is supposed to be IV

In all other instances, yes. But on clocks, it is IIII. Whatever, it isn't a huge deal.

Sparker · 23/05/2010 11:37 PM

Nice watch, speaking of which I should get one though I don't really need to know the time nowadays.

Syfe · 23/05/2010 11:53 PM

i have always seen IV though.

ProperBritish · 24/05/2010 12:36 AM

IIII is an incorrect roman numeral

lol wherever you saw that, someone needs to find a better clock supplier

S7* · 24/05/2010 02:09 AM

very nice squee~

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode THATS NOT A WATCH THIS!! IS A WATCH
Author	Message