Endless Paradigm / Computers & Tech / Crazy Computer / [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard

Thread Closed 
[Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
Author Message
S7*
Sweet Dreams

Posts: 16,689.4373
Threads: 1,056
Joined: 3rd Apr 2007
Reputation: 14.29926
E-Pigs: 383.2289
Offline
Post: #221
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
Newer revisions of x264 are going to have speed improvements as well... how can wee compare benchmarks if wee use different build of x264...
14/03/2010 04:24 AM
Find all posts by this user
Assassinator
...

Posts: 6,646.6190
Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
Offline
Post: #222
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
Senseito7 Wrote:Newer revisions of x264 are going to have speed improvements as well...

Yes, quite a bit of difference.


With x264 r1442. (It says 1342, but that's because the number's built into the script and it doesn't actually check).

Spoiler for results:

Code:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
 
x264 HD BENCHMARK 3.0 RESULTS 
 
Please do not compare it with older versions of the benchmark! 
Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data 
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
 
Results for x264.exe r1342 
-------------------------- 
encoded 1442 frames, 65.88 fps, 3915.51 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 66.26 fps, 3915.51 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 65.89 fps, 3915.51 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 65.70 fps, 3915.51 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 17.83 fps, 3969.48 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 17.70 fps, 3969.28 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 17.84 fps, 3969.85 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 17.83 fps, 3970.09 kb/s
 
 
System Details 
-------------- 
	Name			AMD Phenom X4 9550
	Codename		Agena
	Specification		AMD Phenom(tm) 9550 Quad-Core Processor
	Core Stepping		DR-B3
	Technology		65 nm
	manufacturer		Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
	vendor			Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
	manufacturer		Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
	Stock frequency		2200 MHz
	Core Speed		2640.1 MHz
	FID range		5.0x - 11.0x
 
Northbridge			AMD 780G rev. 00
Southbridge			ATI SB700 rev. 00
 
CAS# latency (CL)		5.0
RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD)	5
RAS# Precharge (tRP)		5
Cycle Time (tRAS)		13
Command Rate (CR)		2T
Memory Frequency		400.0 MHz (3:5)
Memory Type			DDR2
Memory Size			4096 MBytes
Channels			Dual, (Unganged)
 
Windows Version			Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Ultimate Edition   (Build 7600) 
 
Number of processors		1
Number of threads		4
	Number of threads	4 (max 4)
	L2 cache		4 x 512 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size
	Instructions sets	MMX (+), 3DNow! (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, x86-64
	Package 		Socket AM2+ (940)
	Package Type		0x1
 
	Temperature 0	36°C (96°F) [0x24] (TMPIN0)
	Temperature 1	56°C (132°F) [0x38] (TMPIN1)
	Temperature 2	63°C (145°F) [0x3F] (TMPIN2)
	Temperature 0	44°C (111°F) [0x160] (Core #0)
	Temperature 1	44°C (111°F) [0x160] (Core #1)
	Temperature 3	44°C (111°F) [0x160] (Core #3)
	Temperature 2	44°C (111°F) [0x160] (Core #2)


Senseito7 Wrote:how can wee compare benchmarks if wee use different build of x264...

Use a designated version.
14/03/2010 05:17 AM
Find all posts by this user
S7*
Sweet Dreams

Posts: 16,689.4373
Threads: 1,056
Joined: 3rd Apr 2007
Reputation: 14.29926
E-Pigs: 383.2289
Offline
Post: #223
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
Assassinator Wrote:
Senseito7 Wrote:how can wee compare benchmarks if wee use different build of x264...

Use a designated version.

>_>

which one are wee going to use it then?

It seems only Joe88 is having problems with the Benchmarks version :/
14/03/2010 05:25 AM
Find all posts by this user
Assassinator
...

Posts: 6,646.6190
Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
Offline
Post: #224
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
Senseito7 Wrote:
Assassinator Wrote:
Senseito7 Wrote:how can wee compare benchmarks if wee use different build of x264...

Use a designated version.

>_>

which one are wee going to use it then?

It seems only Joe88 is having problems with the Benchmarks version :/

That's only his laptop.  His normal computer works fine.

Or you could just choose a recent version (like 1471), if you really want.
14/03/2010 05:40 AM
Find all posts by this user
Joe88
Paradigmatic Apprentice

Posts: 27.3574
Threads: 0
Joined: 25th Jan 2009
Reputation: 0.51458
E-Pigs: 0.9171
Offline
Post: #225
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
yea, laptop didnt like the ver they threw in there

desktop crashed because of a slightly unstable OC
14/03/2010 02:05 PM
Find all posts by this user
Assassinator
...

Posts: 6,646.6190
Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
Offline
Post: #226
RE: [Updated] EP Computer Benchmarking Powerboard
Senseito7 Wrote:
Assassinator Wrote:1. PCMark Vantage was the benchmark I was talking about where the core2duos ripped up the corei7s.

That's pretty spoon of Futuremark O_o

anyway, lets give x264 Benchmark a shot, I've added relevent info and a board ready for first score. Work machine testing shall commence xD

Errrr.... actually, I had a look again.  He didn't specify which PCMark, and wee simply assumed it was the new one.  But infact, it's PCMark05.

So yeah, mystery solved.

ProperBritish Wrote:someone needs to add an x264 benchmark table to the OP

I'll do that now.

EDIT: Done...

Ok... Tabling Methodologies.
- Ranking is based on 2nd pass results (not that it matters at the moment, but it could in the future).  Because.
- Results are picked from the fastest of each of the set of 4 scores.  This makes it easier to update the tables (don't need to do any maths).  And it's a better measure than the average in a lot of cases anyway.
(This post was last modified: 14/03/2010 08:53 PM by Assassinator.)
14/03/2010 08:21 PM
Find all posts by this user
S7*
Sweet Dreams

Posts: 16,689.4373
Threads: 1,056
Joined: 3rd Apr 2007
Reputation: 14.29926
E-Pigs: 383.2289
Offline
Post: #227
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
greg from psp-hacks Wrote:Core i7 should be fairly good with single threaded stuff with Turbo Boost.

Actually, the Benchmark site says to turn it off.
(This post was last modified: 15/03/2010 06:34 AM by S7*.)
15/03/2010 06:33 AM
Find all posts by this user
Mickey
Down with MJ yo

Posts: 3,663.2843
Threads: 251
Joined: 26th Apr 2008
E-Pigs: 28.7300
Offline
Post: #228
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
Spoiler for results:

Code:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
 
Results for x264.exe r1342 
-------------------------- 
encoded 1442 frames, 13.45 fps, 3896.61 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 13.62 fps, 3896.61 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 6.47 fps, 3896.61 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 6.19 fps, 3896.61 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 3.34 fps, 3971.28 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 2.21 fps, 3971.28 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 3.22 fps, 3971.28 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 2.20 fps, 3971.28 kb/s
 
 
System Details 
-------------- 
	Name			Intel Celeron M
	Codename		Merom
	Specification		Genuine Intel(R) CPU             575  @ 2.00GHz
	Core Stepping		M0
	Technology		65 nm
	Stock frequency		2000 MHz
	Core Speed		1995.2 MHz
 
Northbridge			Intel GL40 rev. 07
Southbridge			Intel 82801IM (ICH9-M) rev. 03
 
CAS# latency (CL)		5.0
RAS# to CAS# delay (tRCD)	5
RAS# Precharge (tRP)		5
Cycle Time (tRAS)		15
Memory Frequency		332.5 MHz (1:2)
Memory Type			DDR2
Memory Size			2048 MBytes
Channels			Dual, (Symmetric)
 
Windows Version			Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Ultimate Edition   (Build 7600) 
 
Number of processors		1
Number of threads		1
	Number of threads	1 (max 1)
	L2 cache		1024 KBytes, 4-way set associative, 64-byte line size
	Instructions sets	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T
	Package (platform ID)	Socket P (478) (0x7)
 
	Temperature 0	46°C (114°F) [0x36] (Core #0)
[Image: MiCk3Y.jpg]
[Image: battle.png]
Spoiler for link:
15/03/2010 09:36 AM
Find all posts by this user
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative

Posts: 17,022.2988
Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1294
Offline
Post: #229
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
As expected, the 6 core i7 Extreme 980X kicks donkey in this benchmark:
[Image: 21965.png]
[Image: 21966.png]

Source: http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=3763
Just for anyone interested to see how they compare with the best.
(This post was last modified: 22/03/2010 08:18 PM by ZiNgA BuRgA.)
22/03/2010 08:18 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Assassinator
...

Posts: 6,646.6190
Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
Offline
Post: #230
RE: [Updated!] EP Computer Benchmarking PowerBoard
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:As expected, the 6 core i7 Extreme 980X kicks donkey in this benchmark:

Well, encoding is one of the most CPU dependent things out there, and scales almost directly with total CPU power.


That's about 3 times my performance (counting 2nd pass ofcourse).

But almost noone cares about their encoding speed (who encodes stuff a lot here?  Me and... me?), and almost everyone care about their gaming instead.  Too bad for gaming it'll be more like a 2% difference in FPS (which you can't even notice) than 200%.

That being said, if you're not an encoderfag like me, why even buy powerful CPUs?  Get yourself a core i5 or PII and be happy.  The GPU is a 10x better place to dump your extra funds if you want to play games better.
(This post was last modified: 22/03/2010 09:14 PM by Assassinator.)
22/03/2010 08:35 PM
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme:


Privacy Policy | Endless Paradigm | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication