Post Reply 
exFAT aka FAT64
Author Message
squee666
Grand Warlock

Posts: 3,567.1000
Threads: 351
Joined: 4th May 2007
Reputation: 12.17831
E-Pigs: 555.9025
Offline
Post: #1
exFAT aka FAT64
have any of you guys tried it on your flashpens the speed increase in transfers is noticeable :D
it can now be used in readyboost in win 7 also


discuss

[Image: IuZelj2.png]
Spoiler for anime watched:
[Image: squee666.jpg]
08/02/2009 06:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Assassinator
...

Posts: 6,646.6190
Threads: 176
Joined: 24th Apr 2007
Reputation: 8.53695
E-Pigs: 140.8363
Offline
Post: #2
RE: exFAT aka FAT64
Nope, haven't tried it yet.

I hardly ever use USB flash drives any more these days though. My portable HDD has replaced all of those.
08/02/2009 06:37 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative

Posts: 17,022.2988
Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1274
Offline
Post: #3
RE: exFAT aka FAT64
According to Wiki, does it require Vista to use it?  If so, it won't work for me, since every computer I interact with (except secondary home PC) is running XP (my PC, work PC, public computers, Uni computers etc).

What block size are you using?
08/02/2009 06:43 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
squee666
Grand Warlock

Posts: 3,567.1000
Threads: 351
Joined: 4th May 2007
Reputation: 12.17831
E-Pigs: 555.9025
Offline
Post: #4
RE: exFAT aka FAT64
32kb block size by default it goes up to 32mb block size :D

by default format to exfatis available on win 7

new microsoft update came out around last week with exfat drivers for xp and vista though vista could read since sp1
so update :D
also the overhead is smallerm ntfs uses around 47mb on a 4gb this uses around 900kb

it also has the 4gb file size limit removed

The exFAT file system driver incorporates the following advanced structures to improve performance:

* A cluster bitmap for fast allocation
* A per-file contiguous bit for fast file access
* Better contiguous on-disk layout (useful for recording movies)
* Support for Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) time stamps

[Image: IuZelj2.png]
Spoiler for anime watched:
[Image: squee666.jpg]
08/02/2009 07:21 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ProperBritish
Daddy Proper
Team DreamArts

Posts: 5,666.3250
Threads: 192
Joined: 19th Nov 2008
Reputation: -2.36574
E-Pigs: 147.7035
Offline
Post: #5
RE: exFAT aka FAT64
im gonna try this shiz out

[Image: rsz_contrast.png]

Spoiler for More sigs:
[Image: 6xu74t8]
[Image: sig.php]

[Image: 656embk]
[Image: sig.png]
08/02/2009 07:33 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative

Posts: 17,022.2988
Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1274
Offline
Post: #6
RE: exFAT aka FAT64
squee666 Wrote:32kb block size by default it goes up to 32mb block size :D
How does exFAT's 32KB block size compare to FAT32's 64KB block size in terms of speed?

By the way larger block size = faster, but more space wastage.

squee666 Wrote:new microsoft update came out around last week with exfat drivers for xp and vista though vista could read since sp1
so update :D
Problem is public computers are unlikely to have the update installed >_>

squee666 Wrote:* A cluster bitmap for fast allocation
* A per-file contiguous bit for fast file access
* Better contiguous on-disk layout (useful for recording movies)
* Support for Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) time stamps
Only the first of those would actually improve performance...
Contiguous layout is more useful for HDDs, not flash drives...

I might give it a try sometime.  Thanks for the heads up :P

EDIT: doesn't appear that a 64-bit XP driver exists.  Don't really have a spare USB handy either, so I'll skip on this one for now.
(This post was last modified: 08/02/2009 04:43 PM by ZiNgA BuRgA.)
08/02/2009 04:34 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

 Quick Theme: