(01/08/2012 11:55 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:  For complex legal issues like this one, evidence typically needs to be presented months ahead of the trial to allow for both parties to study it and prepare responses.
That's what I've read anyway.  It's not like this is particularly hot off the press, so one would think that Samsung should've submitted it before - a failing on their part really.

Maybe the judge is angry because Samsung are essentially trying to use this as an avenue for an appeal.

I thought there was an issue with releasing evidence publicly too. I'm under the impression that any evidence submitted in court needs to be kept private, making realising documents to the public a brave move.

Again, Apple are acting like spoiled c**ts, really pee's me off when a company is so full of it's self.