ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:^^ O_o, interesting.

Actually, I sorda think it's hardware decoded.  The player used is the same (XMB).  I had to reduce the CPU to under 10MHz to notice any lag at all.

But why WMA?  To take out an option, WMA is actually the slowest :)

EDIT: No DRM used.

U did not notice that i didn't vote yet did u? I only "said" that i voted WMA. So thanks for the clue ^.^. I'll take that into mind when actually voting.

And as for why i decided on WMA, Complexity cancels LC-AAC, and false straight-forwardness cancels MP3. The reasoning's all there:

Assassinator Wrote:Based on logic alone, i would lead towards MP3, BUT it's also likely that Zinga's not going to ask that question if it is... BUT MP3 is that much more simple than  LC-AAC... Dammit, i guess WMA.

So now it's between MP3 and LC-AAC.

I want to vote MP3, cause it's far less complicated than LC-AAC, but i still have doubts on Zinga making us vote if it really was that obvious.

Actually, since it's hardware decoded, why is WMA slower? It's lower in complexity than LC-AAC...