S7*
Sweet Dreams
Posts: 16,689.4373 Threads: 1,056
Joined: 3rd Apr 2007
Reputation: 14.29926
E-Pigs: 383.2309
|
RE: Only one core at 100%, and hiccups...
Assassinator Wrote:SchmilK Wrote:Hi, welcome to the reason i quit playing computer games after bashing console games and only playing PC games for the past 20+ years.
Alot of great games just play straight up poorly on multicore computers :( Infact, Battlefield 2, the game i put in 1000+hours online significantly played worse and worse the faster my computer got :( Going from a Pentium 4 to AMD X2 to CoreDuo to Core2Duo...each time the game introduce more lag, more loading time, less fps during high action times :( Each new cpu also got the latest in video cards...which helped less as well :(
Now I say Playstation 3 for m3 :) (or the wii with the wife :P )
It's still illogical, because even if the game is only using 1 core, the processing power of that single core should still be rising (eg. each core of your core2 is more powerful than a core of your old AthlonX2).
I've always been GPU limited, all the way from the start of time to now.
Well, Pentium 4 had a 3.06GHz HT single core.. average Core Duos were lower single core clocks.
I know clocks may not make a difference but its a reasonable assumption I think xP
|
|
14/02/2010 03:36 PM |
|