When doing something .. [cont..]
|
Author |
Message |
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1274
|
RE: When doing something .. [cont..]
(28/03/2010 11:52 AM)feinicks Wrote: Yes. Failing and succeeding is a matter or perception, but perception in our society is based on Social convention. For instance, if you failed at the test to prove that you're not a nerd, that would imply that you did so to "fit in". You have failed because failing a test is in violation of why you gave it in the first place.
Really though? Wouldn't the reason you gave it in, in the first place, was to prove that you failed?
(28/03/2010 11:52 AM)feinicks Wrote: Unless of course if Social conventions to you are a matter of mockery, then this argument would be invalid.
But then again, even Newton's laws can be broken.
:D
|
|
29/03/2010 04:17 AM |
|
feinicks
One day... we Fly...
Posts: 6,124.6050 Threads: 531
Joined: 27th Mar 2008
Reputation: 2.35695
E-Pigs: 210817.3958
|
RE: When doing something .. [cont..]
(29/03/2010 04:17 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: (28/03/2010 11:52 AM)feinicks Wrote: Yes. Failing and succeeding is a matter or perception, but perception in our society is based on Social convention. For instance, if you failed at the test to prove that you're not a nerd, that would imply that you did so to "fit in". You have failed because failing a test is in violation of why you gave it in the first place.
Really though? Wouldn't the reason you gave it in, in the first place, was to prove that you failed?
Hardly. If your main intent was to fail, you would not give the exam at all.
(29/03/2010 04:17 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: (28/03/2010 11:52 AM)feinicks Wrote: Unless of course if Social conventions to you are a matter of mockery, then this argument would be invalid.
But then again, even Newton's laws can be broken.
:D
XD
(This post was last modified: 29/03/2010 04:44 AM by feinicks.)
|
|
29/03/2010 04:43 AM |
|
RIKKU
Storm Trooper
Posts: 2,380.2478 Threads: 288
Joined: 12th Aug 2007
Reputation: -2.68834
E-Pigs: 69.6099
|
RE: When doing something .. [cont..]
2 zingaburgas please um one in a meal.... um mmm ? fanta please yep yep yep that's it =D no thanks that's the lot k =)
|
|
29/03/2010 04:48 AM |
|
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1274
|
RE: When doing something .. [cont..]
(29/03/2010 04:43 AM)feinicks Wrote: (29/03/2010 04:17 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: (28/03/2010 11:52 AM)feinicks Wrote: Yes. Failing and succeeding is a matter or perception, but perception in our society is based on Social convention. For instance, if you failed at the test to prove that you're not a nerd, that would imply that you did so to "fit in". You have failed because failing a test is in violation of why you gave it in the first place.
Really though? Wouldn't the reason you gave it in, in the first place, was to prove that you failed?
Hardly. If your main intent was to fail, you would not give the exam at all.
Then you would not have succeeded in failing an exam. You would've just not taken it.
|
|
29/03/2010 06:38 PM |
|
feinicks
One day... we Fly...
Posts: 6,124.6050 Threads: 531
Joined: 27th Mar 2008
Reputation: 2.35695
E-Pigs: 210817.3958
|
RE: When doing something .. [cont..]
(29/03/2010 06:38 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: (29/03/2010 04:43 AM)feinicks Wrote: (29/03/2010 04:17 AM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: (28/03/2010 11:52 AM)feinicks Wrote: Yes. Failing and succeeding is a matter or perception, but perception in our society is based on Social convention. For instance, if you failed at the test to prove that you're not a nerd, that would imply that you did so to "fit in". You have failed because failing a test is in violation of why you gave it in the first place.
Really though? Wouldn't the reason you gave it in, in the first place, was to prove that you failed?
Hardly. If your main intent was to fail, you would not give the exam at all.
Then you would not have succeeded in failing an exam. You would've just not taken it.
The outcome of the test would simply be succeed or fail. While you ulterior motive might have been to fail, your ultimate result was failure. Consider this:
If someone commits suicide, while they have succeeded in killing themselves, the successful result is still Failure.
|
|
29/03/2010 09:01 PM |
|
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1274
|
RE: When doing something .. [cont..]
(29/03/2010 09:01 PM)feinicks Wrote: If someone commits suicide, while they have succeeded in killing themselves, the successful result is still Failure.
Failure or phailure?
|
|
29/03/2010 09:09 PM |
|
feinicks
One day... we Fly...
Posts: 6,124.6050 Threads: 531
Joined: 27th Mar 2008
Reputation: 2.35695
E-Pigs: 210817.3958
|
RE: When doing something .. [cont..]
(29/03/2010 09:09 PM)ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: (29/03/2010 09:01 PM)feinicks Wrote: If someone commits suicide, while they have succeeded in killing themselves, the successful result is still Failure.
Failure or phailure?
Actually, Cheese.
|
|
29/03/2010 11:24 PM |
|
ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1274
|
RE: When doing something .. [cont..]
|
|
29/03/2010 11:35 PM |
|
feinicks
One day... we Fly...
Posts: 6,124.6050 Threads: 531
Joined: 27th Mar 2008
Reputation: 2.35695
E-Pigs: 210817.3958
|
RE: When doing something .. [cont..]
|
|
30/03/2010 02:40 AM |
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)