ZiNgA BuRgA
Smart Alternative
Posts: 17,022.2988 Threads: 1,174
Joined: 19th Jan 2007
Reputation: -1.71391
E-Pigs: 446.1294
|
GoogleChauffeur
Apparently, Google have been secretly testing autonomous cars.
Quote:The car is a project of Google, which has been working in secret but in plain view on vehicles that can drive themselves, using artificial-intelligence software that can sense anything near the car and mimic the decisions made by a human driver.
With someone behind the wheel to take control if something goes awry and a technician in the passenger seat to monitor the navigation system, seven test cars have driven 1,000 miles without human intervention and more than 140,000 miles with only occasional human control. One even drove itself down Lombard Street in San Francisco, one of the steepest and curviest streets in the nation. The only accident, engineers said, was when one Google car was rear-ended while stopped at a traffic light.
Autonomous cars are years from mass production, but technologists who have long dreamed of them believe that they can transform society as profoundly as the Internet has.
Robot drivers react faster than humans, have 360-degree perception and do not get distracted, sleepy or intoxicated, the engineers argue. They speak in terms of lives saved and injuries avoided — more than 37,000 people died in car accidents in the United States in 2008. The engineers say the technology could double the capacity of roads by allowing cars to drive more safely while closer together. Because the robot cars would eventually be less likely to crash, they could be built lighter, reducing fuel consumption. But of course, to be truly safer, the cars must be far more reliable than, say, today’s personal computers, which crash on occasion and are frequently infected.
Quote:During a half-hour drive beginning on Google’s campus 35 miles south of San Francisco last Wednesday, a Prius equipped with a variety of sensors and following a route programmed into the GPS navigation system nimbly accelerated in the entrance lane and merged into fast-moving traffic on Highway 101, the freeway through Silicon Valley.
It drove at the speed limit, which it knew because the limit for every road is included in its database, and left the freeway several exits later. The device atop the car produced a detailed map of the environment.
The car then drove in city traffic through Mountain View, stopping for lights and stop signs, as well as making announcements like “approaching a crosswalk” (to warn the human at the wheel) or “turn ahead” in a pleasant female voice. This same pleasant voice would, engineers said, alert the driver if a master control system detected anything amiss with the various sensors.
The car can be programmed for different driving personalities — from cautious, in which it is more likely to yield to another car, to aggressive, where it is more likely to go first.
Christopher Urmson, a Carnegie Mellon University robotics scientist, was behind the wheel but not using it. To gain control of the car he has to do one of three things: hit a red button near his right hand, touch the brake or turn the steering wheel. He did so twice, once when a bicyclist ran a red light and again when a car in front stopped and began to back into a parking space. But the car seemed likely to have prevented an accident itself.
When he returned to automated “cruise” mode, the car gave a little “whir” meant to evoke going into warp drive on “Star Trek,” and Dr. Urmson was able to rest his hands by his sides or gesticulate when talking to a passenger in the back seat. He said the cars did attract attention, but people seem to think they are just the next generation of the Street View cars that Google uses to take photographs and collect data for its maps.
- Source: [NYTimes]
|
|
10/10/2010 05:14 AM |
|
LumpiaWarrior
chef d(^.^)b
Posts: 508.2504 Threads: 40
Joined: 6th Nov 2009
Reputation: -7.31666
E-Pigs: 22.2371
|
|
10/10/2010 05:52 AM |
|
S7*
Sweet Dreams
Posts: 16,689.4373 Threads: 1,056
Joined: 3rd Apr 2007
Reputation: 14.29926
E-Pigs: 383.2289
|
RE: GoogleChauffeur
(10/10/2010 07:58 AM)ProperBritish Wrote: i love driving
no drivin 4 u
|
|
10/10/2010 09:55 AM |
|
Hellgiver
Team Ramrod
Posts: 1,875.3073 Threads: 230
Joined: 27th Sep 2007
Reputation: 2.15096
E-Pigs: 57.9774
|
RE: GoogleChauffeur
As much as I love technology, I can't help but be wary of this entire idea... some problems that come to mind:
As something becomes mass-produced, the chances of malfunction increases, as there is a greater testing population. Would driving tests have to be changed completely? And, would there be an override feature, should something go awry? If so, the lack of experience, or even the lack of continual practice could be quite fatal. Sure, you could give someone a written test to make sure they "know" what to do if something malfunctions, but similar to most people I know who, when the time comes, cannot properly correct their car when it begins to "fishtail", or deal with a car that begins to spin, due to lack of exposure to said situations, I could see the lack of exposure to many of driving's hazards be quite hard to overcome.
Then, I have to wonder about proper integration into society. How hard would it be to get every single person, in every small town, redneck, Mayberry town, every backwoods person, everyone in general, to integrate such a change into their lives. I cannot really liken it to automobiles overtaking horse and carriage, as both still had the factor of human awareness and control. As the article said, the only accident sustained was when one of the testdriven cars was rearended by another car at a red light. That would indicate that as long as 100% distribution of said technology is not achieved, likelihood of accidents will still be a problem, and without the ability to properly judging the right course of action to avoid the accident, even more catastrophic accidents could ensue.
Of course, this is all speculation on my part. Those are just the first thoughts that came to mind whenever I think about self-driving cars. Similar thoughts persist when I think about flying cars. As I stated before, my biggest problem is likely the lack of attention people would give to the driving. People are susceptible to "highway hypnosis" and dividing their attention while driving to their texting or talking on phone, or countless other things. It would be only logical to suspect that they would give even less attention when their active participation in the driving is lessened (imagine the bike incident in the article, but with an asleep or unalert driver at the wheel).
My point? Awesome idea, I love technology, but I don't trust people. This is going to take a lot of tweaking to overcome all these obstacles.
<3 Diego!
|
|
10/10/2010 10:32 AM |
|