diego Wrote:* diego has exited thread.
* beaner2k6 follows
...I have finally read this whole thing and now understand that I understand nothing, or rather nothing there is to be understood.
I'm not quite sure what I am thinking or whether I am currently thinking at all, but I do believe this may provide and answer to infinity or the abstract concept of infinity; however, by proving this you have set us back because you have further proved that wee have proved nothing. And proving nothing means that these them selves are not proved. Or rather unproved. By substitution you can constitute that nothing is proven or that nothing can be proven, but by proving nothing can be proven, you have broke the very principle that is saying nothing can be proven. At this point I think I am thinking in a loop or just spouting nonsense.
Maybe wee're not suppose to prove things maybe wee just let them be.
It can't be negative because it is positive, but it can't be positive because being positive makes it negative. So if
- = + and + = - I guess you could just say they are equal, the same thing, or neutral.
Perhaps instead of negative and positive all things are zero.
Slushba132 Wrote:...I have finally read this whole thing and now understand that I understand nothing, or rather nothing there is to be understood.
I'm not quite sure what I am thinking or whether I am currently thinking at all, but I do believe this may provide and answer to infinity or the abstract concept of infinity; however, by proving this you have set us back because you have further proved that wee have proved nothing. And proving nothing means that these them selves are not proved. Or rather unproved. By substitution you can constitute that nothing is proven or that nothing can be proven, but by proving nothing can be proven, you have broke the very principle that is saying nothing can be proven. At this point I think I am thinking in a loop or just spouting nonsense.
Maybe wee're not suppose to prove things maybe wee just let them be.
It can't be negative because it is positive, but it can't be positive because being positive makes it negative. So if
- = + and + = - I guess you could just say they are equal, the same thing, or neutral.
Perhaps instead of negative and positive all things are zero.
Now your just trying to be confusing
I think you went overboard here...
Did you include the "if you try to fail and succeed, which one are doing?"
I'm saying that by substituting the words in these scentences you can disprove anything you feel like disproving. And then substituting again you can disprove the disapproval of said object. Therefore reproving it. But by doing that nothing will get anywhere and nothing will ever be proven or unproven. When you take out two sides, all you have left is the middle. The middle, The nothing, the balance, the zero of all things.
Slushba132 Wrote:I'm saying that by substituting the words in these scentences you can disprove anything you feel like disproving. And then substituting again you can disprove the disapproval of said object. Therefore reproving it. But by doing that nothing will get anywhere and nothing will ever be proven or unproven. When you take out two sides, all you have left is the middle. The middle, The nothing, the balance, the zero of all things.
I know, i was just playing before, im pretty smart if a want to be DX