25/06/2012, 01:37 AM
Code:
|
CPU peaked at 56*C.
And with updated x264.exe:
Code:
|
|
CPU peaked at 56*C.
And with updated x264.exe:
|
Kuu Wrote: [ -> ]Code:
x264 HD BENCHMARK 3.0 RESULTS Please do not compare it with older versions of the benchmark! Please copy/paste everything below the line to to report your data ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Results for x264.exe r1342 -------------------------- encoded 1442 frames, 130.43 fps, 3900.68 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 130.39 fps, 3900.68 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 130.14 fps, 3901.21 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 129.42 fps, 3900.68 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 41.34 fps, 3970.47 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 41.39 fps, 3971.68 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 41.50 fps, 3971.32 kb/s encoded 1442 frames, 41.40 fps, 3971.61 kb/s System Details -------------- Name Intel Processor product System Product Name Codename Specification Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz Core Stepping Core Speed 3503.5 MHz Northbridge Intel ID0150 rev. 09 Southbridge Intel ID1E44 rev. 04 Memory Type Memory Size 16260 MBytes Windows Version Microsoft Windows 7 (6.1) Ultimate Edition Service Pack 1 (Build 7601) Number of processors 1 Number of threads 4 Number of threads 4 (max 16) L2 cache 4 x 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64-byte line size Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, VT-x, AES, AVX Package Temperature 0 37°C (98°F) [0x25] (SYSTIN) Temperature 1 48°C (117°F) [0x5F] (CPUTIN) Temperature 0 28°C (82°F) [0xBC2] (TZ00) Temperature 1 30°C (85°F) [0xBD6] (TZ01)
Assassinator Wrote: [ -> ]Did you overclock your thing or do anything else?
How come Zinga with the same CPU got vastly inferior results...
|
Seems about right.
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: [ -> ]Out of interest, what VCore you running at for the 4.8GHz clock?
|
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: [ -> ]You must've got pretty good die then, cause that seems to be quite good.
Kuu Wrote: [ -> ]That makes more sense. Most people seem to need ≥1.2V for 4.5GHz clocks on that chip. Apparently ≥1.3V isn't good for the chip, so I'd probably drop it a bit further.ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: [ -> ]You must've got pretty good die then, cause that seems to be quite good.
Haha I meant 1.35v, not 1.135. Final over clock was 4.7 Ghz at 1.30v. I could get to 4.9 without crashing but it was unstable under prolonged load. RAM went from 1333MHz to 1600MHz (1599) after OC.