Endless Paradigm

Gallery: http://syaoran728.deviantart.com/
Keep note: I'm linking these from deviantart and not from photobucket. i didn't make them.



i only linked the 4 but there are more at the deviants gallery.

the haruhi one is awesome

i think Auras a bit unbalanced :P

each card is so random...

Out of the 4 you listed. None of them are very good.

Haruhi is horrible. How many "espers", "time travelers" and "aliens" do u see in magic? like nothing... It's multi-coloured, expensive, only functions well with other creatures...

Ren is also bad. Basically takes you 6 mana to get something +2/+2 and a faster 1st strike. Too expensive for what it does. Better equipments out there.

Sayoran isn't much good either. 4 for a 2/3. Yes it has Bushido, but that's defensive. And even if it was a 3/4, without any abilities, it's still not that good.

Aura has a powerful ability, but is somewhat fragile. yes, she can make herself invulnerable, but note that planeswalker abilities can only be used as a sorcery, which means after your turn ends, she becomes vulnerable again, and u can't use the ability again. They will just attack it, cast spells on it, get rid of it. So although it says you can't loose and they can't win, it'll be hard to keep alive, so that means nothing. Platinum angel is less vulnerable, and can attack = way better.


But all in all, the purpose is not to make them really broken, so theres nothing wrong with them being unplayable, and they look cool.

haruhi » can make any character an esper/time traveler/alien.

Ren » requires another card on play field.

Sayoran » i can agree with

Syfe Wrote:haruhi » can make any character an esper/time traveler/alien.

Takes mana to do that. There are better way to spend mana. If u take a look at some of the stuff out there that costs one of every colored mana, they're game-winning. haruhi is far from. At-least not any time fast, and not without a huge investment.

Syfe Wrote:Ren » requires another card on play field.

I was saying it is bad. So no argument there.

Assassinator Wrote:Out of the 4 you listed. None of them are very good.

Haruhi is horrible. How many "espers", "time travelers" and "aliens" do u see in magic? like nothing... It's multi-coloured, expensive, only functions well with other creatures...

Ren is also bad. Basically takes you 6 mana to get something +2/+2 and a faster 1st strike. Too expensive for what it does. Better equipments out there.

Sayoran isn't much good either. 4 for a 2/3. Yes it has Bushido, but that's defensive. And even if it was a 3/4, without any abilities, it's still not that good.

Aura has a powerful ability, but is somewhat fragile. yes, she can make herself invulnerable, but note that planeswalker abilities can only be used as a sorcery, which means after your turn ends, she becomes vulnerable again, and u can't use the ability again. They will just attack it, cast spells on it, get rid of it. So although it says you can't loose and they can't win, it'll be hard to keep alive, so that means nothing. Platinum angel is less vulnerable, and can attack = way better.


But all in all, the purpose is not to make them really broken, so theres nothing wrong with them being unplayable, and they look cool.

well i don't play magic so that really doesn't concern me

i don't play magic... :( so i don't know the rules...

beaner2k6 Wrote:well i don't play magic so that really doesn't concern me

I used to play magic, about like 4 years ago. Don't play it now either.

These cards are designed for fun anyways, not designed to be the best cards that will make it to each deck, so there's nothing wrong with them being not very good.

And when i said unplayable, that is, unplayable at high level play. At casual level play, they're all playable. Haruhi would be pretty good at casual level play probably.



Had a look at his gallery. He did a good job on them. They look pretty nice.

His Tales of Symphonia cards seems to be better (in functionality) on average than his others though...

Some stuff like

Are really good (in terms of functionality. how good the card is in a deck.)