If you had to pick one evil over another who would you choose.
So... Ending the world immediately isn't an option? Why delay it?
Hellgiver Wrote:So... Ending the world immediately isn't an option? Why delay it?
Oh sure now you tell me about options. No there are none in the US when the popular vote means nothing.
Colbert for President..... of south Carolina.
UncertainGod Wrote:Colbert for President..... of south Carolina.
YEAH
its a mute point - the republicans will 'borrow' it again by just over 50% of the votes, same as last time so they can continue this damned war wee go dragged into.
I'm voting this round against hillary, haven't decided yet who the least of the evils are, but hillary is queen evil robot bitch of soullessness +3, and i don't want her outlawing video games/common sense
^ repub or demo, there's no way wee'll be able to get out of iraq. wee're there for the long haul...
UncertainGod Wrote:Colbert for President..... of south Carolina.
that too
Oh My all this negativity. Had I known it would be this interesting I would have added Romney to the mix.
Humm
yes america can't leave from iraq now its too late for that
they have to bring relative security to the country before they leave or the extremist elements there will rise up very quickly
and if wee left, china would be there in 5-10 years, and blowing up the WTC would have been a waste from the get go. GWB and his advisors (...the patriots) wouldn't want that.