12/03/2007, 04:49 PM
Source: YouTube
It was a great movie, very thrilling from start to finish. Truly showed how a real team should work together. If you didn't read the story in school you would almost think the movie fight scenes were farfetched.
It had a fishy moment later in the movie that seemed to change how things could of panned out, but don't know how much of what was shown was based on history on the novel.
Yada yada yada, I guess just post your thoughts, comments, & how you would rate the movie.
Quote:Zack Snyder's stylishly hyperviolent "300" retells the iconic tale of the Spartans stand at Thermopylae for a 21st century audience, and retells it well.
This is no mean feat as there are many powerful elements at play here. First there is the story itself, of how 300 Spartan warriors took on the might of the advancing Persian army under led by Xerxes. They knew it was suicide, but could consider no other option under the Spartan code of honor.
"300" is also based on the Frank Miller graphic novel which tells the story through a heady mixture of starkly beautiful if blood-soaked images.
It could be a horrible mess, but Snyder pulls it off by finding and maintaining a finely tuned balance of story and style. He brings a humanity to the Spartans who history has often portrayed as unthinking zealots. The Spartan King Leonidas (Gerard Butler) knows what he has to do, but he is always considering and re-considering the implications of his decisions. His actions are based on his love for his family and his city.
Snyder also uses the camera to capture the smooth simplicity of Miller's graphic novel, much more successfully than was done in "Sin City." That Miller adaptation overwhelmed and repulsed at times, while "300" draws the audience in.
Much of "300" was shot against blue screens and the scenery added later. But Snyder gets real power from the close-ups on his actors. This is a film which revels in the horrors of hand-to-hand combat with spears and swords. The action, often in slow motion, features sprays of blood and mountains of corpses. It's horrific and fascinating.
It's not perfect: the Persians are portrayed as a strange hoard with consisting of mutants, and mask-wearing monsters with a penchant for facial piercings. Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro) comes across as kind of silly. But this seldom detracts from the main story.
Snyder launches his film as the world continues a raging debate over the justifications and cost of wars. Actors at the premiere reportedly declined to be drawn into any discussion of a message in "300." This story could be interpreted in many ways, pro-war, pro-peace, a simple retelling of a classical story, or a pointed commentary on the war on terrorism.
The ancient Greeks had a talent for telling morally ambiguous tales.
It was a great movie, very thrilling from start to finish. Truly showed how a real team should work together. If you didn't read the story in school you would almost think the movie fight scenes were farfetched.
It had a fishy moment later in the movie that seemed to change how things could of panned out, but don't know how much of what was shown was based on history on the novel.
Yada yada yada, I guess just post your thoughts, comments, & how you would rate the movie.